This is a subject that really interests me. Pyrocumulonimbus are really quite spectacular but are. unfortunately. so devastating. Concerning the 2003 Canberra bushfire, there is substantial evidence of an tornado. There is in fact a scientific article written about this event-
Title: Violent pyro-convective storm devastates Australia's capital and pollutes the stratosphere
Author(s): Fromm M, Tupper A, Rosenfeld D, et al.
Source: GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS Volume: 33 Issue: 5 Article Number: L05815 Published: MAR 15 2006
I will have to read this in more detail when I have the time but just having a brief read it seems quite interesting. In the article they state that the pyrocumulonimbus produced an F2 tornado based on a damage survey and they also provide information on the tornado's path. Interestingly, there is also a photo of what they believe to be the tornado. There was also reports of black hail generated by the intense updrafts. The maximum height of echos (by radar) were 15 km.
I certainly believe that the key for these kinds of events, other than extremely dry conditions, is steep lapse rates. Here is the Wagga sounding from that day-
http://soundings.bsch.au.com/skew-t.html?source=wyoming&lat=-35.1333&lon=147.3667&gribdate=&month=01&day=18&year=2003&hour=00&window=onKeep in mind that Canberra is roughly at 600m above sea level compared to 200m for Wagga Wagga and that Canberra reached 37C that day. There is no doubt that dry adiabatic or super adiabatic lapse rates extended well up into the mid levels of the troposphere. With all the energy released from the fire there would have been quite a bit of instability locally so there would have been nothing stopping air rising all the way to the tropopause. Conversely, at night time an inversion typically develops above the ground which would really put the breaks on pyrocumulonimbus formation (think of it like a cap on a storm day).
Michael
Edit: Typo