David,
In the presentation by Dick Whitaker on Wednesday night, there obviously was no mention of the type of supercell mentioned. I am surprised that the word "super-cell" was used in the first place given the term was founded in the 1950's - obviously it was suggested after the event. Whether it was a classic or HP is unknown - very heavy rainfall and flash flooding as well as internal water damage in houses also occurred in some suburbs. This tends to dispell the hypothesis of an LP supercell. If the storm organised rapidly with a new updraft, one should not be surprised of a huge overhang dropping massive chunks of hail in some areas with little or no rainfall.
The question begs: was this hailstorm potentially more damaging than the Sydney hailstorm April 14 1999? Given the observations of hail size, I see no real evidence of one being more intense than the other. It goes down to the fact that 1947 had a sparse population and thus not as much observations into the database. However, I recall Rob Webb suggesting there were so many reports of hail 10 to 11cm, that they accepted that as a new maxmimum hail size.
Regards,
Jimmy Deguara