Hi Michael,
Yes the shear on the day may not have been what one believes incredible but it was definitely sufficient and remember we were at near 1000 metres above sea level - so bases were not high. Second, the storm became anchored - I can only assume this given the storm was not moving at the same pace as others on the day in some cases with less shear. It was I believe on a triple point - something that will not generally show on our GFS resolution models (lack of data).
Also be careful when considering simply shear alone. There was meant to be high instability - you require less shear with higher instability. However, if a storm develops and anchors on a triple point - ie its existence and behaviour is dictated by the conditions near the triple point, then it has an advantage as winds from various directions can aid low level vorticity. COnsider 5th June 2005 in the US ok 6000CAPE but less wind shear than this. However, despite the HP supercell nature of this storm it moved sharply right and also developed near the intersection of a retreating warm front, dryline creating a triple point. This storm produced a decent tornado! The rotation was significant!
I hope that helps. This is what I mean about people acquirign ample knowledge simply by going on even one US trip!
I am still on a high with this!
Regards,
Jimmy Deguara