Storm News
[Index][Aussie-Wx] |
Australian Weather Mailing List Archives: Monday, 28 June 1999 |
From Subject -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 001 Don White [donwhite at ozemail.com.au] snow in Sydney 002 wbc at ozemail.com.au (Laurier Williams) Rain Gauges 003 Lindsay [writer at lisp.com.au] Rain in Blackheath 004 wbc at ozemail.com.au (Laurier Williams) Jet stream and upper divergence 005 David Croan [bustchase at yahoo.com] ENSO and Sydney hail 006 Michael Scollay [michael.scollay at telstra.com. Thickness lines 007 Paul_Mossman at agd.nsw.gov.au Mid North Coast Obs. 008 John Woodbridge [jrw at pixelcom.net] Rain Gauge 009 John Woodbridge [jrw at pixelcom.net] Mid North Coast Obs. 010 wbc at ozemail.com.au (Laurier Williams) Rain Gauge 011 Anthony Cornelius [cyclone at flatrate.net.au] New Email Address 012 Keith Barnett [weather at ozemail.com.au] snow in Sydney 013 Jimmy Deguara [jimmyd at ozemail.com.au] snow in Sydney 014 "Michael Thompson" [michaelt at ozemail.com.au] snow in Sydney 015 "Michael Thompson" [michaelt at ozemail.com.au] Not much rain south of Illawarra 016 Ben Quinn [bodie at flatrate.net.au] SE QLD wx -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 001 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:28:30 +1000 From: Don White [donwhite at ozemail.com.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: snow in Sydney Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Paul... A SSW change that passed through Sydney around 3-4 pm on 27 July 1986 dropped the temp to 7 degrees. The showers with the change included some soft hail - the process of formation is different but naturally, because of the cold and the soft hail the media claimed "snow". It was too warm for that. don White Paul Graham wrote: > > I remember the time in 1986 (possibly August) when there was a brief > snowfall through parts of Sydney. It lasted about 10 minutes but melted > fairly quickly after settling on the ground. I'd be interested to know what > the temperature was at the time since, although it was cold, I don't think > it was exceptionally cold. I seem to remember that the cloud was a tall > cumulus and this may have been a factor. > - Paul G. > > >From: Don White> >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: Aussie Weather > >Subject: aus-wx: snow in Sydney > >Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:18:41 +1000 > > > >Tomorrow is the anniversary of the only measurable snow in Sydney on 28 > >June 1836. In the Colonial Newspaper on the follwoing Thursday the > >reportincluded the note that snow was several inches deep towards > >Parramatta. (See my note in tomorrow's Daily Telegraph > >Don White > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 002 From: wbc at ozemail.com.au (Laurier Williams) To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain Gauges Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:30:26 GMT X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com On Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:01:03 +1000, Michael Bath wrote: >Peter, > >The Nylex 1000 is good, and the BoM will accept readings taken with it. >Always measure at 9am each day and record amounts to the nearest 0.2mm, >rounded up. Michael and Peter, just two small points. Firstly, I'd suggest reading to the nearest 0.1mm. The BoM specification is to read to the nearest 0.2mm, but is the only national met organisation I'm aware of that does this -- the international standard is to read to the nearest 0.1mm, and in fact a rain day is defined as one with >=0.1mm from other than fog or dew. I can only conclude that the Bureau, when metrication took place, felt that 0.2mm coincided (almost) with 0.01 of an inch. Having made that decision, it's easier to avoid a statistical problem caused by rounding up to the nearest 0.2mm. If you round up every one of, say, 20 rainfall readings in a month, and, say, half are on the 0.2 and half are in between, you will overestimate the total rain by 10 x 0.1mm = 1mm. Not much, but, following the example, it could give you an overestimated annual rainfall of 12mm. If the measuring glass is graduated to 0.5, then estimating to the nearest 0.1 is quite possible, and the minor errors in estimation you make should cancel out over time. If your eyesight and judgement are fantastic, and you can estimate to the nearest 0.05mm, always round to the *odd* figure -- so both 12.25mm and 12.35mm would be recorded as 12.3. Hope this helps. -- Laurier Williams Australian Weather Links and News http://www.ozemail.com.au/~wbc/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 003 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:50:11 -0700 From: Lindsay [writer at lisp.com.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I) To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain in Blackheath Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks Ben, I've emailed my provider. Lindsay P. Ben Munro wrote: > > Lindsay, you need to get your time zone changed. I think that the date/time > stamp is put on by your isp?? email them about it > The time zone on your mail is -0700, or western north america. > 20:44 on the 26th in that time zone doesn't occur for almost another 17 hours. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 004 From: wbc at ozemail.com.au (Laurier Williams) To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Jet stream and upper divergence Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:48:54 GMT X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com There's been some correspondence on this topic recently. If you want to learn by observation about the relationship between jet stream location, vorticity and upper divergence, the 12-hourly satpix at http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/shemi/winds/winds.html are a great start. They are overlaid with data derived from cloud movement, and the panels in the bottom two rows show wind shear and upper divergence. The wind shear panels show contours for the *difference* in wind speed between the average high level (150 to 350hPa) flow and the average low level (700 to 925) flow -- not quite the pure jetstream but a close approximation. On the upper level divergence charts, the solid lines represent upper divergence and the dotted lines show upper convergence. Download the two panels (or, preferably, sequences of them), then toggle between the shear and divergence panels. After a few weeks, you'll be seeing the relationships between the two. They also have some nice explanatory stuff at http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/other/faq_winds.html -- Laurier Williams Australian Weather Links and News http://www.ozemail.com.au/~wbc/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 005 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:39:14 -0700 (PDT) From: David Croan [bustchase at yahoo.com] Subject: aus-wx: ENSO and Sydney hail To: aussie- weather [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, On a few occasions we have had some discussion on the list re. the correlation between SOI and severe thunderstorms in Brisbane and Sydney. I just noticed that the following reference should be available now and might be of interest: "Kuhnel, I., 1998, The use of multifactor Southern Oscillation Index for the estimation of annual hailstorm frequencies in the Sydney area, International Journal of Climatology, (in press)". David _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free at yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 006 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:23:34 +1000 From: Michael Scollay [michael.scollay at telstra.com.au] Organization: Telstra Strategy & Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4m) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Cc: robd at geo.vuw.ac.nz Subject: Re: aus-wx: Thickness lines Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Laurier Williams wrote on Sat, 26 Jun 1999 07:44:46 GMT: > > On Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:27:33 +1200, "Ben Tichborne" > wrote: > > > Below what line would you normally expect snow to fall > > to sea-level?... [snip] > ... > Anyway, you lucky Un Zudders now have Rob Davies at MetVUW > producing snowfall (and accumulated snow) forecasts for you > at http://www.geo.vuw.ac.nz/~robd/snow.html. The commentary > at the bottom is very relevant to this discussion. > > BTW, he threatens to produce similar maps for Australia -- maybe > we should all email him to express our strong support! Absolutely. However, on the private side of things, I've been generating predictive models from AVN data for some time now targeted specifically at Perisher Valley (my club lodge) with my only problem now outstanding being a precipitation increase prediction based upon orographic lifting forcing. This is possibly the most difficult parameter to predict as it can account for up to 400% increase over and above the AVN prediction at times and 0% at other times. The models arn't real good at incorporating local scale topography as Rob rightly points out but that's where a bit of local knowledge can add significant value. Michael Scollay mailto:michael.scollay at telstra.com.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 007 From: Paul_Mossman at agd.nsw.gov.au X-Lotus-Fromdomain: NSW_AG To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:33:24 +1000 Subject: aus-wx: Mid North Coast Obs. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Howdy all. Wet weekend with falls on both days in the mid teens (yea yeah I know we didn't get as much as Brisbane.... :-) However for those that CARE - WE MADE THE AVERAGE!! WOOhoo Total rain for the year now is close on 1000mm which is better then last year by 200mm. One point that has irked me all weekend - the radar quality for Mid North coast is abysmal. I noted on 9 occasions last , Friday & Saturday nights when we received heavy showers that lasted for 10 - 15mins with return rates between 0.4 - 1.0 mm per min that didn't even show on Radar. What's the use of even having the stupid thing if it don't register! Hope the BOM guys are listening. They need to plonk a radar site on top of middle Brother which would give excellent coverage between the Williamtown and Coffs Harbour radars and west to Tamworth. And its not like we don't get decent action here - I mean Bulahdelah had the Country's only F5 tornado........ There - that's my gripe. Paul back at Port. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 008 From: John Woodbridge [jrw at pixelcom.net] To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: RE: aus-wx: Rain Gauge Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:03:37 +1000 Organization: Pixel Components X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Laurier, A chance for me to offer a controversial opinion.... I seem to recall from my Engineering days, that one normally assumes instrument accuracy to be plus or minus one half the finest graduation on the scale. Therefore, if your rain guage is marked in 0.5mm increments, the inherent accuracy is taken to be plus or minus 0.25mm in the markings themselves. Therefore there would seem little point in attempting to eyeball it closer than this. While you may be able to approximate down to 0.1mm or better by visual inspection - the accuracy of the instrument isn't there to support this observation. Regards, John. >snip Firstly, I'd suggest reading to the nearest 0.1mm. The BoM specification is to read to the nearest 0.2mm, but is the only national met organisation I'm aware of that does this -- the international standard is to read to the nearest 0.1mm, and in fact a rain day is defined as one with >=0.1mm from other than fog or dew. I can only conclude that the Bureau, when metrication took place, felt that 0.2mm coincided (almost) with 0.01 of an inch. Having made that decision, it's easier to avoid a statistical problem caused by rounding up to the nearest 0.2mm. If you round up every one of, say, 20 rainfall readings in a month, and, say, half are on the 0.2 and half are in between, you will overestimate the total rain by 10 x 0.1mm = 1mm. Not much, but, following the example, it could give you an overestimated annual rainfall of 12mm. If the measuring glass is graduated to 0.5, then estimating to the nearest 0.1 is quite possible, and the minor errors in estimation you make should cancel out over time. If your eyesight and judgement are fantastic, and you can estimate to the nearest 0.05mm, always round to the *odd* figure -- so both 12.25mm and 12.35mm would be recorded as 12.3. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 009 From: John Woodbridge [jrw at pixelcom.net] To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: RE: aus-wx: Mid North Coast Obs. Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:12:09 +1000 Organization: Pixel Components X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com That we know about.... >snip And its not like we don't get decent action here - I mean Bulahdelah had the Country's only F5 tornado........ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 010 From: wbc at ozemail.com.au (Laurier Williams) To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain Gauge Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:02:01 GMT X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com On Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:03:37 +1000, John Woodbridge wrote: >Hi Laurier, > >A chance for me to offer a controversial opinion.... > Hi John. I *love* a little controversy -- keeps life on the boil! >I seem to recall from my Engineering days, that one normally assumes >instrument accuracy to be plus or minus one half the finest graduation on >the scale. Therefore, if your rain guage is marked in 0.5mm increments, >the inherent accuracy is taken to be plus or minus 0.25mm in the markings >themselves. Therefore there would seem little point in attempting to >eyeball it closer than this. While you may be able to approximate down to >0.1mm or better by visual inspection - the accuracy of the instrument isn't >there to support this observation. > The assumption is that the designers of the instrument learnt the same rule during *their* engineering days :-) My Dobbie Brothers Bureau-standard wet, dry, max and min thermometers are all graduated to 0.5C, yet are certificated accurate to within 0.05C. And the Bureau requires them to be read to the nearest 0.1C. I think that, regardless of instrument accuracy, what's most important is to avoid the "round-up" rule. The rule in all scientific areas where figures are averaged, totalled or otherwise manipulated is to round to the odd figure. Otherwise you are building in error. The problem with the Bureau's 0.2mm rule is that there is no odd figure to round to, and in an area with 150 raindays in a year, the annual total will be systematically inflated, on average, by 75 x 0.1 = 7.5mm. If callibration of the gauge suggested it was only accurate to the nearest 0.25mm, it would be better to record to the nearest 0.5mm, and round measurements that fall exactly halfway between graduations to the nearest 0.5 rather than whole mm. Likewise, recording to the nearest whole millimetre could be preferable in a less accurate gauge, again rounding to the nearest odd-numbered millimetre in cases where the gauge reads on a 0.5. Given the variables that can reduce the accuracy of rainfall measurement (catch lost to shelter or hail bounce or wind eddies, shape and quality of gauge, small children with buckets of water, errant dogs), I think it's important to reduce every controllable source of error, particularly statistical ones. -- Laurier Williams Australian Weather Links and News http://www.ozemail.com.au/~wbc/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 011 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:28:28 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius [cyclone at flatrate.net.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: Australian Weather Mailing List [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: aus-wx: New Email Address Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, My old ISP has gone bust. If you need to contact me, please use: cyclone at flatrate.net.au Thanks, Anthony Cornelius +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 012 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:55:39 +1000 From: Keith Barnett [weather at ozemail.com.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: snow in Sydney Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I think it might have been July that year..there was snow in parts of the northern and northwestern suburbs of which Seven Hills (where I live) was one. I remember seeing a shower moving north along the main road through the district, that looked like a hail shaft only not as bright. Getting home shortly afterward it was only 5 degrees, and that was about 4.30pm. I presume that what I saw was a mix of snow and rain, but I wasn't close enough to verify.I remember the cumulus clouds too..billowing icy tops with dark bases. Paul Graham wrote: > > I remember the time in 1986 (possibly August) when there was a brief > snowfall through parts of Sydney. It lasted about 10 minutes but melted > fairly quickly after settling on the ground. I'd be interested to know what > the temperature was at the time since, although it was cold, I don't think > it was exceptionally cold. I seem to remember that the cloud was a tall > cumulus and this may have been a factor. > - Paul G. > > >From: Don White > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: Aussie Weather > >Subject: aus-wx: snow in Sydney > >Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:18:41 +1000 > > > >Tomorrow is the anniversary of the only measurable snow in Sydney on 28 > >June 1836. In the Colonial Newspaper on the follwoing Thursday the > >reportincluded the note that snow was several inches deep towards > >Parramatta. (See my note in tomorrow's Daily Telegraph > >Don White > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 013 X-Sender: jimmyd at pop.ozemail.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:35:22 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara [jimmyd at ozemail.com.au] Subject: Re: aus-wx: snow in Sydney Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Don, It seemed like what we had here was light sleet that seemed to fall in flurries. It was very cold that afternoon. Two days later on the Sunday morning, -5 to -6 as I recall and the heaviest frost I have seen. I recall you Don talking on the radio suggesting the temperature had dropped rapidly in the few hours before dawn. The temperature rose 15C - 16C that day to 10C. Jimmy Deguara At 07:28 28/06/99 +1000, you wrote: >Paul... >A SSW change that passed through Sydney around 3-4 pm on 27 July 1986 >dropped the temp to 7 degrees. The showers with the change included some >soft hail - the process of formation is different but naturally, because >of the cold and the soft hail the media claimed "snow". >It was too warm for that. >don White > >Paul Graham wrote: >> >> I remember the time in 1986 (possibly August) when there was a brief >> snowfall through parts of Sydney. It lasted about 10 minutes but melted >> fairly quickly after settling on the ground. I'd be interested to know what >> the temperature was at the time since, although it was cold, I don't think >> it was exceptionally cold. I seem to remember that the cloud was a tall >> cumulus and this may have been a factor. >> - Paul G. >> >> >From: Don White >> >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >> >To: Aussie Weather >> >Subject: aus-wx: snow in Sydney >> >Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:18:41 +1000 >> > >> >Tomorrow is the anniversary of the only measurable snow in Sydney on 28 >> >June 1836. In the Colonial Newspaper on the follwoing Thursday the >> >reportincluded the note that snow was several inches deep towards >> >Parramatta. (See my note in tomorrow's Daily Telegraph >> >Don White >> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >> > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >> > message. >> > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ >> >> ______________________________________________________ >> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Jimmy Deguara Vice President ASWA from Schofields, Sydney e-mail: jimmyd at ozemail.com.au homepage with Michael Bath http://www.australiansevereweather.simplenet.com/ Australian Severe Weather Association home information page http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 014 From: "Michael Thompson" [michaelt at ozemail.com.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: Re: aus-wx: snow in Sydney Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:19:03 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I remember this event well in the Illawarra. The temperature peaked at something like 16C earlier in the day, but a fast moving front with cold SW winds and an associated cloud band dramatically dropped the temperature around 1-2pm, with the front the temperature plummeted down to something like 6C here, something I have never seen before or since of at that time of afternoon here. Snow fell on the Illawarra escarpment down to very low levels, I drove up Macquarie Pass and the first snow on ground was seen well short of the top at approx 400-500m, this was an hour after the fall and it must of fell lower. perhaps 250-300m. Snow flurries were reported from the F6 toll gates and the top of Mt Kiera. Despite the cold no snow fell at my home, just cold bitter rain. Some radio reports did mention snow, but I am always the doubter, 6C just is not cold enough. Michael > I remember the time in 1986 (possibly August) when there was a brief > snowfall through parts of Sydney. It lasted about 10 minutes but melted > fairly quickly after settling on the ground. I'd be interested to know what > the temperature was at the time since, although it was cold, I don't think > it was exceptionally cold. I seem to remember that the cloud was a tall > cumulus and this may have been a factor. > - Paul G. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 015 From: "Michael Thompson" [michaelt at ozemail.com.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: aus-wx: Not much rain south of Illawarra Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:35:40 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com In a repeat of almost the whole of this year so far the Illawarra seems to be the stop point of rainfall. All weekend I could see blue cloudless sky to the far south, whilst very light showers fell here. This is not the first time I have seen this ! The south coast whilst certainly not drought affected is in need of a good drink. Michael Thompson http://thunder.simplenet.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 016 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:56:07 +1000 From: Ben Quinn [bodie at flatrate.net.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: SE QLD wx Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey Ben from Brisbane here.. 11:45pm here and i just got woken up by a Cg.. this is the fourth night in a row i have had thunder with 10-15 rumbles over a few hours each night.. isn't it JUNE?!?! :) BTW i had 37mm here last night, which is pretty ordinary really (but nice for this time of year).. others scored much better with some falls up to 100mm in the southern suburbs of Brisbane and plenty of falls around 40-60 in coastal areas.. As i write this email lightning more frequent and drawing closer with moderate/heavy rain.. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
Document: 990628.htm
Updated: 24 July 1999 |
[Australian Severe Weather index] [Copyright Notice] [Email Contacts] |