Storm News
[Index][Aussie-Wx] |
Australian Weather Mailing List Archives: Sunday, 16 April 2000 |
From Subject -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 001 Andrew Boskell [a_boskell at yahoo.com] Awsome Thunderstorm hit Devonport 2am!! 002 "Les Crossan" [les.crossan at virgin.net] Photo at Bus Stops 003 Chas & Helen Osborn [hosborn at tassie.net.au] Awsome Thunderstorm hit Devonport 2am!! 004 Jimmy Deguara [jdeguara at ihug.com.au] Photo at Bus Stops 005 Susan Puddifer [susanpud at healey.com.au] Photo at Bus Stops 006 "Les Crossan" [les.crossan at virgin.net] Photo at Bus Stops 007 Lindsay [writer at lisp.com.au] Highs... and Welcome John 008 Andrew Wall [astroman at chariot.net.au] more cold air Cb's for Adelaide 009 Jimmy Deguara [jdeguara at ihug.com.au] Current situation Eastern Australia 010 "Michael Thompson" [michaelt at ozemail.com.au] Photo at Bus Stops 011 Phil Bagust [paisley at cobweb.com.au] Page update 9/4/00 storms in Adelaide 012 Phil Bagust [paisley at cobweb.com.au] Photo at Bus Stops 013 Anthony Cornelius [cyclone at flatrate.net.au] (Embarrassing) Weather Doco On Last Night 014 "DAMIEN HOWES" [dhowes at powerup.com.au] (Embarrassing) Weather Doco On Last Night 015 Chas & Helen Osborn [hosborn at tassie.net.au] Antarctica URL 016 "Lyle Pakula" [remote at leski.com.au] Highs... and Welcome John 017 "Lyle Pakula" [remote at leski.com.au] Thunder In Brighton 018 "Leslie R. Lemon" [lrlemon at compuserve.com] BSCH Picture Update 019 Carl Smith [carls at ace-net.com.au] (Embarrassing) Weather Doco On Last Night 020 David Carroll [davidkc at nia.net.au] Severe weather Advice 021 David Carroll [davidkc at nia.net.au] Central West. 022 "Dane Newman" [dpn at bigpond.com] Kilsyth thunder 023 "Chris Gribben" [chrisgribben at hotmail.com] Melbourne cells 024 Andrew Miskelly [amiskelly at ozemail.com.au] Will Winter Arrive on Friday? 025 "McDonald" [mcdonald at one.net.au] Storm Chase around Melbourne 026 Andrew Wall [astroman at chariot.net.au] Melbourne cells 027 "McDonald" [mcdonald at one.net.au] Will Winter Arrive on Friday? 028 "McDonald" [mcdonald at one.net.au] Melbourne cells 029 Anthony Cornelius [cyclone at flatrate.net.au] (Embarrassing) Weather Doco On Last Night 030 "Debbie Parker" [debp at rie.net.au] Storm Chase around Melbourne 031 Anthony Cornelius [cyclone at flatrate.net.au] Melbourne cells 032 "Chris Gribben" [chrisgribben at hotmail.com] Melbourne cells 033 "Nick Sykes" [nsykes22 at optushome.com.au] Storm Chase around Melbourne 034 "Weatherhead" [weatherhead at ozemail.com.au] Melbourne cells 035 "John Woodbridge" [jrw at pixelcom.net] (Very Embarrassing) Weather Doco On Last Night 036 "John Woodbridge" [jrw at pixelcom.net] Thunder intensity, was Melbourne cells -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 001 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 10:08:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Boskell [a_boskell at yahoo.com] Subject: aus-wx: Awsome Thunderstorm hit Devonport 2am!! To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Good morning All! Well, what can I say! It's 2:50am and I'm still pumping! I was awoken by some distant thunder and thought it would be one of those "couple of rumbles then gone".........I was wrong! The lightning intensified quickly, then I noticed and large dark swirling "mass" sweeping in from the West. Then I could see from the street lights that it was a wall of rain! It hit with gale force winds blowing down some trees in the park next to us, it was like "all hell broke loose"! With each ribbon of lightning the following thunder sounded like canon fire!! There were several power transformer "flashes"- long green flashes with an associated bang! There were sensor lights going off and the rain was coming in horizontal! I couldn't get a Radar image, when I click the link nothing happens...maybe someone seen the Radar image? The wind lasted for around 20-25 mins and now it is almost calm! There is still some thunder rumbling now. It will be interesting to see how much damaged was caused. I should have got the video camera out, but I guess I was too overwhelmed! Well better go back to bed and try to get some sleep! Regards, Andrew. PS. At last I have something interesting to report!:-)) ===== Andrew Boskell "Some people are weather wise, others are otherwise!" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send online invitations with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 002 From: "Les Crossan" [les.crossan at virgin.net] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Photo at Bus Stops Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 18:39:58 +0100 Organization: Cosmic EuroCon - note all times are always GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Susan Puddifer [susanpud at healey.com.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 6:49 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Photo at Bus Stops > Hi All, > > I think I can work out why they chose that pic. See if I can explain it properly > > The conception we all have in our mind is of raised temperatures which would kill > of most (or if you believe them) all of the current plant life which would then > lead to the death of all animals. Huh??? Plants evolved to deal with more CO2 that what is presently in the atmosphere, plants would work more efficiently in elevated CO2 levels and help bring the levels back down. It's ozone layer depletion and the associated UV that'll kill plants, not temperatures raised by 1 or 2 degrees and the most important form of plantlife and major oxygen producer is phytoplankton and that's in the sea. Ozone layer loss is not global warming. Nor is acid rain, which kills plants. > When we look at the photo, not only do we see what appears to be rain on the > right hand front of the photo, but the structure of the cloud has a marked > similarity to a volcanic eruption cloud. It's a rotating pulse storm or LP supercell - nothing volcanic about it. Perhaps the tree got clobbered by a CG from said storm? > Now, as we all know, this is one of the > other things that we are to expect with global warming ie, the increase in > volcanic activity and earthquakes. > How can volcanoes and earthquakes be affected by an atmospheric phenomenon - these events are driven from the inside of the planet and not from the outside... > I believe the photo is very very effective and works very well on our > preconceptions of global warming. Does it - the advertisers are using an emotional argument rather than cold hard fact - there is no real proof that the planet is warming up - it's only 30 years ago that we were all going to freeze... My .01$ / �0.01 worth.... Les (UK) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 003 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 06:38:36 +1000 From: Chas & Helen Osborn [hosborn at tassie.net.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Awsome Thunderstorm hit Devonport 2am!! Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello Everyone Not the action here that Andrew had but we did have a thunderstorm pass south of us at 6am! There is still another line of weather to the west on the radar and should be here in a hour. Chas Strahan Tasmania Andrew Boskell wrote: > Good morning All! > > Well, what can I say! It's 2:50am and I'm still > pumping! I was awoken by some distant thunder and > thought it would be one of those "couple of rumbles > then gone".........I was wrong! The lightning > intensified quickly, then I noticed and large dark > swirling "mass" sweeping in from the West. Then I > could see from the street lights that it was a wall of > rain! It hit with gale force winds blowing down some > trees in the park next to us, it was like "all hell > broke loose"! With each ribbon of lightning the > following thunder sounded like canon fire!! There were > several power transformer "flashes"- long green > flashes with an associated bang! There were sensor > lights going off and the rain was coming in > horizontal! I couldn't get a Radar image, when I click > the link nothing happens...maybe someone seen the > Radar image? The wind lasted for around 20-25 mins and > now it is almost calm! There is still some thunder > rumbling now. It will be interesting to see how much > damaged was caused. I should have got the video camera > out, but I guess I was too overwhelmed! Well better go > back to bed and try to get some sleep! > > Regards, > Andrew. > > PS. At last I have something interesting to report!:-)) > > ===== > Andrew Boskell > > "Some people are weather wise, others are otherwise!" > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send online invitations with Yahoo! Invites. > http://invites.yahoo.com > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 004 X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 06:54:30 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara [jdeguara at ihug.com.au] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Photo at Bus Stops Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I can tell you I am not the artistic type, Susan. Thanks for the input. Makes sense now. Jimmy Deguara At 15:49 15/04/00 +1000, you wrote: >Hi All, > >I think I can work out why they chose that pic. See if I can explain it >properly > >The conception we all have in our mind is of raised temperatures which >would kill >of most (or if you believe them) all of the current plant life which would >then >lead to the death of all animals. This would be followed by constant >heavy rain >and cloud. This would supposedly then drop the temperature significantly and >cause the next Ice Age. > >Now, if we examine the photo, we see propped up on the front left what >appears to >be a dead tree (strengthening the idea that all plant life would be dead). We >then are aware that the photo is very very dark showing heavy cloud, which we >would now be thinking of as constant heavy cloud, a severe lack of light, >and a >plummeting temperature. >When we look at the photo, not only do we see what appears to be rain on the >right hand front of the photo, but the structure of the cloud has a marked >similarity to a volcanic eruption cloud. Now, as we all know, this is one >of the >other things that we are to expect with global warming ie, the increase in >volcanic activity and earthquakes. > >I believe the photo is very very effective and works very well on our >preconceptions of global warming. > >Just my 2 cents worth. > >Susan > > >Jimmy Deguara wrote: > > > A firm has used a photo in an advertising campaign associated with trying > > to promote an understanding of the global warming. The photo is the > following: > > > > > www.australiansevereweather.simplenet.com/photography/photos/1999/1122jd01.jpg > > > > The photo will be used at bus stops around Sydney CBD mainly and during the > > following time period: > > > > May 2 for one week > > > > May 23 for one week > > > > June 13 for one week > > > > I wouldn't mind seeing what the add looks like and how it is displayed. To > > tell you the truth, I don't know why they chose that one. Goes to show how > > others not in the weather business think based on their perceptions. > > > > Jimmy Deguara > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 005 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 06:57:08 +1000 From: Susan Puddifer [susanpud at healey.com.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; I; PPC) To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Photo at Bus Stops Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Les Maybe I didn't explain myself properly in my opening statement. What I meant to say was more along the lines of the way the media has been brainwashing the population about this for many years. I was I suppose being a tad facetious in the way I phrased my statements. The media has, I believe, been guilty for many years of running an 'imminent disaster' scenario and generating a great deal of fear in the minds of the average person. I suppose I shoiuld have opened up my initial paragraph with a statement along the lines of 'this is the way the media has been trying to portray global warming and is in no way associated with the truth'. I was trying to do an overview of the subliminal effect of the photo - not an overview of what the photo really represented. My belief is that we've been through many of these global warmings, ozone depletions and subsequent coolings and we will go through many more. However I'm quite happy to be proven wrong. Susan Les Crossan wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Susan Puddifer> To: > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 6:49 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Photo at Bus Stops > > > Hi All, > > > > I think I can work out why they chose that pic. See if I can explain it > properly > > > > The conception we all have in our mind is of raised temperatures which > would kill > > of most (or if you believe them) all of the current plant life which would > then > > lead to the death of all animals. > > Huh??? Plants evolved to deal with more CO2 that what is presently in the > atmosphere, plants would work more efficiently in elevated CO2 levels and > help bring the levels back down. It's ozone layer depletion and the > associated UV that'll kill plants, not temperatures raised by 1 or 2 degrees > and the most important form of plantlife and major oxygen producer is > phytoplankton and that's in the sea. Ozone layer loss is not global warming. > Nor is acid rain, which kills plants. > > > When we look at the photo, not only do we see what appears to be rain on > the > > right hand front of the photo, but the structure of the cloud has a marked > > similarity to a volcanic eruption cloud. > > It's a rotating pulse storm or LP supercell - nothing volcanic about it. > Perhaps the tree got clobbered by a CG from said storm? > > > Now, as we all know, this is one of the > > other things that we are to expect with global warming ie, the increase in > > volcanic activity and earthquakes. > > > > How can volcanoes and earthquakes be affected by an atmospheric phenomenon - > these events are driven from the inside of the planet and not from the > outside... > > > I believe the photo is very very effective and works very well on our > > preconceptions of global warming. > > Does it - the advertisers are using an emotional argument rather than cold > hard fact - there is no real proof that the planet is warming up - it's only > 30 years ago that we were all going to freeze... > > My .01$ / �0.01 worth.... > > Les (UK) > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 006 From: "Les Crossan" [les.crossan at virgin.net] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Photo at Bus Stops Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 21:29:36 +0100 Organization: Cosmic EuroCon - note all times are always GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Susan Puddifer [susanpud at healey.com.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 9:57 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Photo at Bus Stops > Les > Maybe I didn't explain myself properly in my opening statement. What I meant > to say was more along the lines of the way the media has been brainwashing the > population about this for many years I believe that global warming's a myth - having been through one ice age prediction. It'll sort itself out - Gaia will take care of that. Right, well in the meantime if the world gets warmer then perhaps us here at 55N 1-30W might see more of this kind of storm - will have to get into my solar cell powered car (not mains electric - unless fusion / wind / wave powered electricity) and chase it....or take the train (us MSC members are good at that) thats having saved a few whales and recycled a few newspapers and advertising hoardings on bus stops just before lunch... (: btw are Sydney buses "eco-friendly" ie do they use hydrogen / rapeseed oil / alcohol??? Les +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 007 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:31:38 -0700 From: Lindsay [writer at lisp.com.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I) To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Highs... and Welcome John Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey, don't those highs look nice situating themselves a little further north just now? Almost (I said almost) looks like a winter pattern. I wonder if they'll stay there for a while? Maybe we might get at least a rain event out of this next front due in Sunday sometime. Might even get a bit chilly up our way. Saturday's event left us with 1mm of rain and a bit of wind - wow. Hey, looks like I've recruited another weather enthusiast from the tennis club. He's 18 and has asked me if I would take him on a snow chase this winter. His name is Adam and he said for me to say hello to you guys as he doesn't have an internet connection. And also, welcome John! Good to have you with us. :-) Lindsay Pearce +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 008 X-Sender: astroman at mail.chariot.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 07:29:23 +0930 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Andrew Wall [astroman at chariot.net.au] Subject: aus-wx: more cold air Cb's for Adelaide Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, we have had a few coldies come over this morning, and looks like more on the way, I will be at wynn vale lookout to watch a possible nice cell come in over the gulf. No activity in them besides a bit of rain as far as I know. cya soon Andrew +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 009 X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 08:19:56 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara [jdeguara at ihug.com.au] Subject: aus-wx: Current situation Eastern Australia Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I have been watching this event slowly unfold. The cold front that was moving through Friday had become near vertical as well as a slight leaning to it. It raced out into the Tasman with a dry line event out there and seems to have stalled or slowed down rapidly. Now Sunday morning, there is a north west cloud band racing down. Cold air in the Bight is pushing north east and based on the erratic but prominent instability in the Tasman caused more by the warm ocean currents and colder upper air temperatures, it seems that a low will develop over the next 24 - 36 hours off the coast. It will be interesting to see this system develop. There are weak storms (even structure shows) from around 7:30am to 8:00am: one to my northwest and another to the southwest. The northwest cloud band should drop some decent rain as well but it depends where the low develops in relation to Sydney as to where most of the rain will fall. Jimmy Deguara +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 010 From: "Michael Thompson" [michaelt at ozemail.com.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Photo at Bus Stops Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 08:55:58 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Not sure what you are saying here Les, I will treat it as satire. The buses in Wollongong are good old diesel, not sure about Sydney. Australia is almost up there with the USA when it comes to energy consumed per head of population, and that is a lot more than the UK. On the other hand Australian's who visit the UK are surprised by the relaxed attitude towards smoking, in Australia all restaurants have non-smoking areas. Shopping malls, public transport and work places are all no smoking zones. Hope you are not smoker Les, you may find your trip chasing downunder different. > > Maybe I didn't explain myself properly in my opening statement. What I > meant > > to say was more along the lines of the way the media has been brainwashing > the > > population about this for many years > > I believe that global warming's a myth - having been through one ice age > prediction. It'll sort itself out - Gaia will take care of that. > > Right, well in the meantime if the world gets warmer then perhaps us here at > 55N 1-30W might see more of this kind of storm - will have to get into my > solar cell powered car (not mains electric - unless fusion / wind / wave > powered electricity) and chase it....or take the train (us MSC members are > good at that) thats having saved a few whales and recycled a few newspapers > and advertising hoardings on bus stops just before lunch... (: > > btw are Sydney buses "eco-friendly" ie do they use hydrogen / rapeseed oil / > alcohol??? > > Les > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 011 X-Sender: paisley at mail.cobweb.com.au Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 08:23:39 +0930 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Phil Bagust [paisley at cobweb.com.au] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Page update 9/4/00 storms in Adelaide Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Hi ppls, > >Here is the URL for the SA Page, the chase reports for last weekend are >also up. > >http://sastorms.virtualave.net/index2.html > >enjoy cya > >Andrew > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Hello all, What a lovely day it turned out to be in Adelaide, and despite some tactical blunders and stupid stuffups, my chase had a good ending! After checking the radar at 1.30, I decided to head north to the Barossa. But before I left I decided to check out the air display for the Adelaide 500 race. There was plenty of big cumulus around, and as I was watching the F-18's from my backyard, I was amazed to see a funnel develop from the ragged base of a dissapating congestus! It was a small rope, but no doubt about what it was! I rushed inside to get my camera and just got a shot off before it dissapated. Not bad I thought, a funnel before I even leave! So I headed north to Gawler. On my way a large congestus to my right started to glaciate and develop a lowered base - and low and behold, in the traffic, a large funnel-like appendage! I was heading away from this cloud but managed to get a shot off between buildings. Ahead of me was a large collapsing storm already spreading an anvil overhead. My plan was to get to the north of new towers developing out to the east, and I ignored everything else. Beautiful pileus and lenticular clouds developed over these towers, which had very sheared anvils. I took more shots. It was looking good! I finally got to Truro and realised two things, I wasn't going to be able to catch these towers out to the east, which were much further away that I'd thought, and worse, horror of horrors, I'd not even bothered to focus the half dozen shots I'd already taken, including the two funnels!!!! I was not a happy boy - I really hope these shots can be saved, perhaps in Photoshop. Anyway, my options were now limited, and I headed back south through the Barossa, hoping some new development would catch up with me. I got caught in hilly terrain around Kersbrook and was beginning to think I'd miss out, although the sky was still throwing up towers everywhere and there was plenty of static on the radio. Then I saw a lowering out to the west, this looked good, and I desperately searched for an escape route to give me a good view west. I found one, emerging from the top of the ranges at the Para Wirra conservation park [finding a great new viewing spot]. MY GOD! Over the Elizabeth area amazing things were hapenning!! Two BIG wall cloud-like lowerings, only a few km apart, were dropping copious CG's, precip cascades and showing excellent scud action {inflow/outflow features] and general cloud motion . Making sure I had the focus right this time [:)] I fired off most of the rest of the film here. Finally happy, I drove back through the now outflow dominated storm, got drenched, and fired my last shot off showing the Torrens River in full spate. Result? Despite the stuffups, I'm a happy chappy. Hope the film does justice when it gets back. Andrew and Kathryn? Hope you had some luck today too! There were that many good targets around it would have been hard to miss everything! Phil 'Paisley' Bagust paisley at cobweb.com.au http://www.chariot.net.au/~paisley2 Still looking for Kathryn's reply - expect another post! Phil 'Paisley' Bagust paisley at cobweb.com.au http://www.chariot.net.au/~paisley2 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 012 X-Sender: paisley at mail.cobweb.com.au Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 08:35:53 +0930 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Phil Bagust [paisley at cobweb.com.au] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Photo at Bus Stops Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >I was trying to do an overview of the subliminal effect of the photo - not an >overview of what the photo really represented. >My belief is that we've been through many of these global warmings, ozone >depletions and subsequent coolings and we will go through many more. However >I'm quite happy to be proven wrong. >Susan I don't want to start one of those vicious and never-ending threads about whether global warming does or doesn't exist - in my experience they rarely illuminate anybody or anything. I would just point out two things and encourage discussion: 1] The global insurance industry is certainly taking 'global warming' very seriously 2] It always suprises me that people get locked into this ideological 'it's all our fault, were all going to die / it's not our fault, it doesn't even exist' dichotomy. My take on global warming is that there does seem to be a warming signal there, certainly the CO2 levels are increasing. On one level it doesn't matter whether this is a natural cycle or human made - we are all going to have to deal with the consequences - and one could make the case that because of our vast population, enourmous installed infrastructure, and high level of sequestration of the world's biological resources [agriculture], this civilisation, in spite of its amazing technological capability, is not very well equiped to deal with large scale climate change. My 0.02c worth........ Phil 'Paisley' Bagust paisley at cobweb.com.au http://www.chariot.net.au/~paisley2 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 013 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 09:33:24 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius [cyclone at flatrate.net.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: Australian Weather Mailing List [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: aus-wx: (Embarrassing) Weather Doco On Last Night Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, The weather documentary that I was interviewed on was on CHannel 9, at 8:30pm last night. Probably the worse thing in my mind, was that they used my interview, with James' footage (possibly giving the impression that I took the footage), I wish they credited it to James for James' sake! However, I also stuidly (or more probably, nervously), made a mistake saying a gustnado is a tornado over water! (The gustnado I was thinking of was actually over water, but I twisted the words around), I meant to say it was a tornado on the gust front! Oh well, hopefully everyone forgot to watch it, and it won't be too embarrassing :) They showed some good footage - although in general I disagreed with some of the opinions of the climatologist they featured (just my personal opinion). -- Anthony Cornelius Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 14 Kinsella St Belmont, Brisbane QLD, 4153 Please report severe thunderstorms on our Queensland severe thunderstorm reporting line on (07) 3390 4218 or by going to our homepage at http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 014 From: "DAMIEN HOWES" [dhowes at powerup.com.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: Re: aus-wx: (Embarrassing) Weather Doco On Last Night Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 12:13:00 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 015 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 09:05:50 +1000 From: Chas & Helen Osborn [hosborn at tassie.net.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: Australian Weather Mailing List [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: aus-wx: Antarctica URL Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello Everyone This is live weather from Antarctica http://www.antdiv.gov.au/stations/live.html Raining now 9am. The main action north and south of us. We have a Gale Warning current south and Strong Wind north. Chas Strahan Tasmania +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 016 From: "Lyle Pakula" [remote at leski.com.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Highs... and Welcome John Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 12:24:48 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey Lindsay, I have noticed a slight shift in the high's to the north. I didn't want to say anything and pull a jinx. It was about this time last year that I got my first days snowboarding in up at Mt Baw Baw - let's hope for another strong southerly buster! I have to hope for this stuff, I'm off to the US in winter, so I won't get another southern hemisphere season. Though i'll spend a few weeks in NZ on the way and then be in Colordao for quite some time - can't complain :-) Cya Lyle - - ---==( lyle_pakula at hotmail.com )==--- - - . / \ . /~~~\/ \ " No Friends On A Powder Day " / \ \ / \ \ ----- Original Message ----- From: Lindsay [writer at lisp.com.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2000 9:31 AM Subject: aus-wx: Highs... and Welcome John > Hey, don't those highs look nice situating themselves a little further > north just now? > Almost (I said almost) looks like a winter pattern. I wonder if they'll > stay there for a while? Maybe we might get at least a rain event out of > this next front due in Sunday sometime. Might even get a bit chilly up > our way. Saturday's event left us with 1mm of rain and a bit of wind - > wow. > > Hey, looks like I've recruited another weather enthusiast from the > tennis club. He's 18 and has asked me if I would take him on a snow > chase this winter. His name is Adam and he said for me to say hello to > you guys as he doesn't have an internet connection. > > And also, welcome John! Good to have you with us. :-) > > > Lindsay Pearce > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 017 From: "Lyle Pakula" [remote at leski.com.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: aus-wx: Thunder In Brighton Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 14:22:36 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All, Well the nice echoes heading over Port Phillip Bay towards St Kilda have braught some thunder laong with them. Can't see any lightning but two claps in the last 30 seconds is promissing. I'm right in the firing line - keep you posted. Cheers, Lyle - - ---==( lyle_pakula at hotmail.com )==--- - - . / \ . /~~~\/ \ " No Friends On A Powder Day " / \ \ / \ \ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 018 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 00:56:14 -0400 From: "Leslie R. Lemon" [lrlemon at compuserve.com] Subject: RE: aus-wx: BSCH Picture Update To: "INTERNET:aussie-weather at world.std.com" [aussie-weather at world.std.com] X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id AAA13061 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Hi Everyone, > I had thought that perhaps it was this photo to which the wallcloud > reference was made: > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/pictures/damien/05-01-2000a.htm A great photo of a wall cloud! Les ************************ Leslie R. Lemon Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist Tel. 816-373-3533, 816-213-3237 E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 019 X-Sender: carls at ford.ace-net.com.au Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 15:47:28 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Carl Smith [carls at ace-net.com.au] Subject: Re: aus-wx: (Embarrassing) Weather Doco On Last Night Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well done Anthony. >Hi all, > >The weather documentary that I was interviewed on was on CHannel 9, at >8:30pm last night. Probably the worse thing in my mind, was that they >used my interview, with James' footage (possibly giving the impression >that I took the footage), I wish they credited it to James for James' >sake! However, I also stuidly (or more probably, nervously), made a >mistake saying a gustnado is a tornado over water! (The gustnado I was >thinking of was actually over water, but I twisted the words around), I >meant to say it was a tornado on the gust front! Oh well, hopefully >everyone forgot to watch it, and it won't be too embarrassing :) Do not be too embarrassed, I thought you did a good job with all those cameras and lights poking in your face. It is not easy to maintain clarity of thought with all that attention. I have been witness to a 7:30 report TV interview on an unrelated topic that was conducted in my home when I lived in Tassie, and I understand the kind of invasion of your space that occurrs in these situations. You did very well under the circumstances, and I bet there was hardly a person that even noticed your slip up. I also understand the way that editing can distort what was said, as out of a half hour interview they may select a couple of minutes of clippings that tend to remove things from context. Fortunately, they chose to present you in a good, if slightly eccentric, light, and in any case, storm chasers will always be seen as a little eccentric in the larger society. Editorial bias can be very destructive in the wrong hands. Once again, well done, and good on yer for having the guts to put yourself in the media spotlight, which is always a rather risky thing to do. >They showed some good footage - although in general I disagreed with >some of the opinions of the climatologist they featured (just my >personal opinion). >Anthony Cornelius I think your views on some of the opinions of the climatologist would be worth an airing here, as it would be appropriate as a follow up to the program. Regards, Carl. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 020 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 16:25:09 +1000 From: David Carroll [davidkc at nia.net.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: Aussie Weather [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: aus-wx: Severe weather Advice Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com IDW16N00 TOP PRIORITY FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST SEVERE THUNDERSTORM ADVICE BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE Issued at 1323 on Sunday the 16th of April 2000 This advice affects people in the following weather districts: Hunter Mid North Coast south of Kempsey Central Tablelands north of about Katoomba Central West Slopes and Plains northeast of Nyngan to Orange Northwest Slopes and Plains west of a line Moree to Barraba Upper Western east of Bourke Thunderstorms are forecast within the advice area this afternoon. Some of these are expected to be severe bringing large hailstones, destructive winds and very heavy rainfall. The STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE advises that as storms approach people should: * put vehicles under cover * move indoors away from windows During and after the storm people should: * beware of fallen trees and power lines * keep away from creeks and drains as you may be swept away The RTA recommends motorists switch their lights & wipers on & slow down in the wet. If your house is damaged contact your local SES unit, listed under "S" in the white pages, for emergency assistance. Don't use the telephone during storms. TV CRAWL: Severe Thunderstorm Advice current for the Hunter and parts of the Central Tablelands, Central West Slopes and Plains, Northwest Slopes and Plains, Mid North Coast and Upper Western weather forecast districts. NOT FOR BROADCAST: This Advice message is valid until 6pm. The Bureau and SES would appreciate it being broadcast regularly until this time. Home | News | Learn about Meteorology | Search | Help | Feedback Weather and Warnings | Climate | Catalogue | About The Bureau | Registered Users © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2000, Bureau of Meteorology. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 021 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 16:30:10 +1000 From: David Carroll [davidkc at nia.net.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: Aussie Weather [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: aus-wx: Central West. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All, Just sent an update from BOM, Severe weather advice advised at 1.23pm. Getting good rain here in Bathurst, been good for about an hour now. Nothing else looking out to west from here, just very overcast. Dave +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 022 From: "Dane Newman" [dpn at bigpond.com] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: aus-wx: Kilsyth thunder Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 17:16:06 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com G'day Anthony + All, I didn't forget the weather doco in Brisbane last night......All I can say Anthony is VERY WELL DONE !!! Dont forget that you are your own harshest critic. As far as your supposed ''faux pas'' are concerned, 99.99999999% of the viewers wouldn't even have noticed - and that includes the few who have any knowledge of the subject matter at all. It would have been nerve racking appearing on TV. Also, as anyone who has a particular field of interest knows, as soon as the electronic or print media get involved in something there will invariably be mistakes, misrepresentation of facts plus questionable editing. Anthony, I am sure that James understands this all too well. I have had a lifelong interest in meteorology and Anthony, James, Ben Quinn plus the other members of ASWA and the Brisbane storm chasers have done more to engender a local and practical interest and understanding of thunderstorm events and features than anyone I can remember. Good on you all. Anyhow, that is more than enough sunshine blowing from me...It is midday in Brisbane and there are distant towering Cu to the SW. Maybe there might just be the odd Cb on the NSW border ranges later..PS Anthony I am jealous of your Green Flash. Damien.-----Original Message----->Hi all,
From: Anthony Cornelius <cyclone at flatrate.net.au>
To: Australian Weather Mailing List <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Date: Sunday, 16 April 2000 9:46
Subject: aus-wx: (Embarrassing) Weather Doco On Last Night
>
>The weather documentary that I was interviewed on was on CHannel 9, at
>8:30pm last night. Probably the worse thing in my mind, was that they
>used my interview, with James' footage (possibly giving the impression
>that I took the footage), I wish they credited it to James for James'
>sake! However, I also stuidly (or more probably, nervously), made a
>mistake saying a gustnado is a tornado over water! (The gustnado I was
>thinking of was actually over water, but I twisted the words around), I
>meant to say it was a tornado on the gust front! Oh well, hopefully
>everyone forgot to watch it, and it won't be too embarrassing :)
>
>They showed some good footage - although in general I disagreed with
>some of the opinions of the climatologist they featured (just my
>personal opinion).
>--
>Anthony Cornelius
>Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association
>(ASWA)
>(07) 3390 4812
>14 Kinsella St
>Belmont, Brisbane
>QLD, 4153
>Please report severe thunderstorms on our Queensland severe thunderstorm
>reporting line on (07) 3390 4218 or by going to our homepage at
>http://www.severeweather.asn.au
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
>023 X-Originating-IP: [210.84.138.243] From: "Chris Gribben" [chrisgribben at hotmail.com] To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne cells Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 01:52:15 PDT Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, well certainly a very active day here. Didn't really take much notice of the day until about 1pm when I saw a mass of thick black cloud to my south. I got online and read a couple of emails about there being thunder as well as Nick telling me on IRC he heard some. I ended up heading out about 3.30pm to Doncaster Shoppingtown and filmed a few cells on and off for a while. The storms were high based due to the low DP. One of the lowerings I saw on a cell over about Malvern seemed to have rotation but it is uncelar and the video I took of it will have to be studied to confirm this, it certainly wasn't approaching true wall cloud stage or anything. Caught a few decent CGs as well but missed a heap more. My interest then turned to a cell over Melbourne airport about 5pm. Saw some great CGs out of this cell but as it got closer it seemed to lose its strength. I left Doncaster to head home (about 5 mins - very handy Just saw some CC lighning followed a few seconds later by thunder, its been fine all day here although some good Cb's observed during the day in an unstable west to northwest airflow. Doesnt look like we will get any rain from the cell to the south as it is now moving away. Dane Newman (Kilsyth) Melbourne. 5.15pm) and it started to rain the drops were very large and I was considering the possibility of hail occuring. As I drove through the rain there was an incredibly bright flash followed INSTANTANEOUSLY by a thunder. There was literally no gap and the CG strike had either hit a power pole right next to my car or it hit the car itself! I was fine until about 10 secs down the road when it sunk in - hehe. Certainly an experience and by far the closet CG I have experienced or hope to. I was shaking slightly by the time I got home but the adrenalin was certainly there. I just wish I had got it on film or something somehow now. The strangest part of it was the fact the thunder wasn't very loud which leads me to believe that I was almost in the channel path of the strike. Anyone have thoughts on this? Anyone else got stories of close strikes? All in all a great day and fantastic to have such weather in april which has been boring for the last 5 years. Chris ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 024 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 19:31:11 +1000 From: Andrew Miskelly [amiskelly at ozemail.com.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) To: Aussie Weather [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: aus-wx: Will Winter Arrive on Friday? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Does anyone have any thoughts on the possibility of SE Aus getting it's first worthwhile cold change on Friday? The latest GASP run has the 540 thickness line heading north over a bit of the SE on Friday, but I don't know about the other models until they come out tonight. The models I have looked at have been a little erratic lately so I guess we'll have to wait and see but Sydney's extended forecast is for the change on Friday and a cool weekend... Andrew. -- Andrew Miskelly Illawarra/Southern Tablelands, NSW amiskelly at ozemail.com.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 025 From: "McDonald" [mcdonald at one.net.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: aus-wx: Storm Chase around Melbourne Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 20:00:47 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 026 X-Sender: astroman at mail.chariot.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 19:40:15 +0930 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Andrew Wall [astroman at chariot.net.au] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne cells Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Maybe you had your windows up, making it sound heaps quieter than it actually was, maybe the sound of the rain pounding on your roof deafened the sound, maybe you were dreaming the whole thing :) nah, I have heard that the closer the strike from you the less impact it has, something to do with the shock wave not being able to get to full strength, I dunno, but the one I encountered whilst watching from my aluminium door way, didn't seem that loud also, and that was only 10-30 ft away. Maybe there is an explanation, but I will be buggered if I can remember it now. Happy hunting!!! Andrew [snip] I was shaking slightly by the time I got home but the adrenalin was certainly there. I just wish I had got it on film or something somehow now. The strangest part of it was the fact the thunder wasn't very loud which leads me to believe that I was almost in the channel path of the strike. Anyone have thoughts on this? Anyone else got stories of close strikes? All in all a great day and fantastic to have such weather in april which has been boring for the last 5 years. >Chris +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 027 From: "McDonald" [mcdonald at one.net.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Will Winter Arrive on Friday? Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 20:17:04 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew Miskelly [amiskelly at ozemail.com.au] To: Aussie Weather [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2000 7:31 PM Subject: aus-wx: Will Winter Arrive on Friday? > Hi all, > > Does anyone have any thoughts on the possibility of SE Aus getting it's > first worthwhile cold change on Friday? The latest GASP run has the 540 > thickness line heading north over a bit of the SE on Friday, but I don't > know about the other models until they come out tonight. > > The models I have looked at have been a little erratic lately so I guess > we'll have to wait and see but Sydney's extended forecast is for the > change on Friday and a cool weekend... > > Andrew. > > -- > Andrew Miskelly > Illawarra/Southern Tablelands, NSW Andrew, I checked the models on Friday and thought the same thing Andrew except I think it may be delayed until Saturday. Even so, when I last checked the models, it showed potential for some severe cold air CB's over Vic with SW'ly surface flow of 25knts and N'ly 500mb flow of 60knts (estimate). I'll keep checking the models as the week goes by and outlooks will be psted to MSC page. Andrew McDonald. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 028 From: "McDonald" [mcdonald at one.net.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne cells Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 20:13:51 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Gribben [chrisgribben at hotmail.com] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2000 6:52 PM Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne cells Chris wrote: > As I drove > through the rain there was an incredibly bright flash followed > INSTANTANEOUSLY by a thunder. There was literally no gap and the CG strike > had either hit a power pole right next to my car or it hit the car itself! I > was fine until about 10 secs down the road when it sunk in - hehe. Certainly > an experience and by far the closet CG I have experienced or hope to. I was > shaking slightly by the time I got home but the adrenalin was certainly > there. I just wish I had got it on film or something somehow now. The > strangest part of it was the fact the thunder wasn't very loud which leads > me to believe that I was almost in the channel path of the strike. Anyone > have thoughts on this? Well - I do know something - I can guarantee that while driving, thunder is very difficult to hear even when very close (i also found out today with several strikes within 3km of me). I'm not sure if this is due to the road noise, the movement of the car or something else. Anyone? Macca +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 029 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 21:42:39 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius [cyclone at flatrate.net.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: (Embarrassing) Weather Doco On Last Night Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Damien, Carl and all, Thanks for the kind words guys! Much appreciated, although I don't feel any less stupid :-) Carl Smith wrote: Evening all,After a phonecall from Jane at 12:30pm telling me that there was some serious looking congestus to the SW and W I decided on a storm chase after checking radar, soundings and forecast charts. LI's of -1 to -2 and CAPE of 500 or so across Central Victoria had me more than a little interested, along with the 20knt 850mb winds, 60knt 500mb winds and a 300mb jet of 105 knts. Also the temperature profile of the atmosphere was interesting me with thoughts of hail popping into mind with 850 temps of 8C, 500mb temps of -21C and 300mb temps of -46C.I headed out the Western Ring Road and headed NW on the Calder Highway to Diggers Rest. I pulled off the road and waited and watched. Decaying anvils to my N and more active cells to my S and W kept me interested for about 20 minutes while I waited for something further W to take off as the cells to the S, while being the best looking, were heading over the metropolitan area into traffic and unchaseable country. At about 2:15pm I decided to head for some developing cells to my W and WSW which were about 50km away. These two cells both had nice flanking lines and the W cell had a nice overshoot (no photos these as the features were picked up through small breaks in the low cloud). I headed WSW towards Melton to intercept these cells which were probably NNW of Geelong at the time. I stopped briefly in Melton East to take a photo of the cells to the S and also of a cell to my N, which, although looked nice, was outflow dominated and not worth chasing. I soon found myself in some familiar country out on the Exford Road which heads due W towards the Bacchus Marsh - Geelong Road which was what I was aiming for. Turned S onto that road and now had a clear view of the line of cells which stretched from Lara NW to Merridith. I stopped again just out of Balliang East after seeing lightning from the closest of these cells (which were now combining to form a line) and an interesting lowering. I got a phonecall from Matt Smith with a brief radar update letting me know that the line of cells varied from 2-10mm/h up to 20-40mm/h. I waited here for about 15 minutes before deciding to core punch this line. I headed S again along the Bacchus Marsh - Geelong Road but the RFB was soon right overhead and a new cell was developing closer to the city (now to my E) so I decided against core punching this weakish line and headed E towards Werribee. Lightning became more frequent with about 5 or so crackles from the radio per minute and a few visible CG's just 2 or 3 km away made this drive E very interesting. I had a heavier precipitation shaft to the S which was fairly close and CG's where coming out of the RFB between where I was and the precip shaft. I eventually ran out of road heading E so I picked one heading slightly N which would take me a little further away from the RFB and precip area where I hoped I'd be able to take some photos. This didn't quite eventuate like I'd wanted as the road heading N was just 500m long. There was a dirt road heading E again so I turned onto this hoping that it wasn't too wet and slippery as I was out of mobile phone range. It turns out that this road kept me running parallel with this system from just N of the You Yangs all the way into Werribee. While on this road I had a clear view of the precip area which continued to get heavier just to my S. A new RFB formed on the outflow of the heaviest precipitation area just up the road ahead of me as I entered the outskirts of Werribee. I spoke to Jane O'Neill who was sitting just up the road in Hoppers Crossing taking video of the event as it unfolded. I told her I was going to continue E to try and get myself under the RFB before it dropped its load to see if it was going to hail. I used some creative guesswork to get myself onto Sayers Road which would take me right under the cell which had already started to drop a thick rain curtain down from the middle of the RFB. I sped (literally) along Sayers road but as I was heading into suburban areas I was held up by slow drivers, traffic lights and a train as well. I was still about 3km from the precip shaft with only 10km until I ran out of road (i don't think my car would enjoy driving through Port Phillip Bay) but I pushed on and entered the rain at Altona and within 10 seconds was slowed to 40km/h from the torrential rain. The roads were awash and driving was difficult but I continued heading E towards Williamstown through the rain which kept getting heavier but I was yet to encounter hail (not that I could see out the windscreen though - hehehe). I was stopped again by a train entering Williamstown but as soon as it passed I was heading the last 1km East before reaching the western edge of the bay. The torrential rain had flooded the main street of Williamstown with watter lapping up onto the footpath and stretching across the road in several areas and I encountered some small hail (to about .8cm). I rang the Bureau of Meteorology and reported the the flooding in Williamstown and Altona. I headed back into the heart of Williamstown to take some photos of the flash flooding and found a side road street totally flooded from one side to the other with about 6-8 inches of water in the centre and about 4 inches at the sides. I drove through this and pulled off tot he side of the road (into the flood water - hehe) and took a few photos of this. I could still hear the thunder from the cell as the precip curtain was sitting about 2km offshore and there was still plenty of lightning. As this cell was now unchaseable I headed back out the way I came to see if there was any more significant flooding between Williamstown and Altona but it had subsided significantly by the time I drove back. A new cell had developed to the SW of the other one so I found a spot to pull off the road in Laverton North and I took some photos of this new cell and the still-rampaging cell heading across the bay. With over an hour of daylight left and several cells still firing up to the NW and W I headed out to a cleared area where I had a view of all the cells and picked the next best looking one which was to the NW of the city, probably up near where I started the day at Diggers Rest. I headed back to the ring road and out the Western Highway. I turned N towards the cell just past Caroline Springs down Clarkes Road. It turns out that this was also a "dry weather road only" (dirt road) too. I stopped about 1km down this road and watched as this cell developed a new RFB and scud formed under this and was dragged up to the base. This small lowering was not rotating and I didn't expect it to start given the linear wind shear. The lowering remained visible for the next 20 minutes as I headed back to the Western Highway and onto the Western Ring Road. Once again this cell dumped its load just up the road ahead of me and with the sun setting behind me an awesome rainbow formed in the orange coloured rain curtain and I took a few photos out the windscreen. I pushed into the back of the rain curtain and encountered moderately heavy rain from about Broadmeadows all the way to Bundoora where I took the Plenty Road exit and headed SE along Plenty road into what seemed to be the heaviest rain. Within 200m of heading further S I encountered he heaviest rain of the day with visiblity (while stationary at the lights) was cut down to about 25m. It had been raining heavily in Bundoora for a while and this downpour soon flooded the roads again and the intersection of Plenty Road and Grimshaw Street was like the intersection of two rivers. I plowed through about 3-4 inches of water here and pulled a U-turn and then turned towards home down Grimshaw street (all the while still sitting in torential rain). I encountered more flash flooding at the intersection of Grimshaw Street and Frye Street and again along the Greensborough Bypass and more on Elder Street (just down the road from my house). I got home just as the rain stopped and was informed by my parents that we'd had hail at our house about 2 minutes before (very small). I checked the rain guage as the cell moved off to the E and weakened but thunder was still audible for about 15 minutes. 12mm of rain in about 18 minutes according to my dad. I'm sure other areas like Bundoora would've had slightly more but I thought this was fairly good. All in all a good chase for a late season system.Thanks to Matt Smith (for the radar updates), Clyve Herbert (who rang me at the start of the chase), Jane O'Neill (who alerted me to the developing situation and then kept me informed as to what was happening where she was) and Claire McDonald (for telling me how good the storms were out in the E of the state while I was in the W of the state - thanks sis - hehe).I hope the other Melbournites enjoyed this system. Thanks and congrats to Nick Sykes for picking up the potential for this system yesterday even though the BoM were only going for showers.Andrew McDonald(MSC - Macca)> Once again, well done, and good on yer for having the guts to put yourself > in the media spotlight, which is always a rather risky thing to do. Interestingly on this note, any factual information that I said was actually re-said by John Schluter (eg, tornado information, and SE QLD/border range information), a fair bit of it word for word. Whether or not this was to portray me as an amatuer, different to experts, or they decided that it would work better than that, I don't know - but I won't judge. > >They showed some good footage - although in general I disagreed with > >some of the opinions of the climatologist they featured (just my > >personal opinion). > I think your views on some of the opinions of the climatologist would be > worth an airing here, as it would be appropriate as a follow up to the > program. My opinions are simply that - opinions, and I'm by no means an expert. I feel almost guilty for this, given that Roger Stone made some nice comments about storm chasers :-) I disagreed with his general opinions of this season, talking about how wet it has been in SE QLD this summer - when I thought it has been rather dry! He also said it's a typical La Nina year, where the storm maximum occurs in Nov-Dec, and then tapers off in Jan-Feb, and instead it's just humid, and you get showers/rain instead. He also said this year appeared to be a typical La Nina year. When really, if that were true - given his description of a La Nina year, then we should have had a lot of rain in Jan-Mar, but we didn't. Jan and Feb were very much below average for me, and much of SE QLD. Not to mention, it's been far from humid in Brisbane lately. That was the most noticable thing comparing Jan and Feb with March. Jan and Feb were certainly quite dry (except for the 4 days of summer we had, and DP's got to 26C along the coast!) That was one thing that made it feel so cool/cold. I thought March may have been warmer than February. But Blair proved this not to be the case, however I believe that March overall was more 'humid' than Jan/Feb. This would be explained by the sub-tropical ridge breaking down, and becoming less defined, and giving an Easterly fetch across the Coral, rather than a SE'ly wind. Also - I believe that it is normal that the number of storms experienced tapers off as the storm season progresses is associated with each storm season. Certainly you don't have the air mass 'clashes' that you have in late Spring/early Summer and the cold air aloft also dissappears. During Jan-Feb, normally an upper level ridge sits over us. What I found interesting, was that the formation of the upper level ridge was meant to be associated with the formation of the Cloncurry Low, and the heat trough that extends south from it. While the upper level ridge wasn't as strong, it certainly was present. Other things to consider during that influenced a different weather pattern (rather than El Nino/La Nina), would be the unusual placement of the sub-tropical ridge. It generally sat further north than usual. If anyone can provide an explanation, or another opinion on this - it'd be very much appreciated! I often that it had something to do with a 'positive feedback system' with SST's of the water, and the ridge. Essentially, you'd have the surface ridge driving SE'ly winds up the coast. This would then create a surface SE'ly current, and push cooler water from the south up north. Ridges/sinking air favours areas of cooler air/water - so the ridge would be quite happy to sit there, and it would 'feed' itself cooler water, and the cooler water would feed itself a ridge, and the process could go on until a jet/high eventually moves out of the way. But the effect of the ridge would have displaced the surface trough further inland, so a feature that was commonly seen this season were high's amoebaing themselves into the Tasman Sea underneath and inland surface trough. This then built another ridge on the eastern coast - and the process continued. This certainly wouldn't be the only factor that was cause a displacement of the usual position the sub-tropical ridge lies at. I also believe that the lack of development from the Cloncurry Low also played a part. Had the low developed, the surface/heat trough probably would have become more established, and exerted its dominance over the ridge. Whether it's a case of something influencing and interfering with the development of the heat low over Cloncurry that allowed the sub-tropical ridge to sneak further north, or that it just happened that this year, the sub-tropical ridge was able to exert its dominance before the low could form, I'm not too sure. But the poor thunderstorm (at least in SE QLD), was already evident due to Sept, Oct and Nov all being quite poor thunderstorm wise. There was indeed an increase in November, but certainly quite a reduced number. November also recorded its coldest average max on record - with a plethora of other stations around Queensland. So something certainly was 'brewing' well before that. If anyone has any opinions, or information - I'd be very interested to hear it! As I said, these are just my opinions, and I'm by no means an expert - so please don't take it as if I'm saying Roger Stone is incorrect! -- Anthony Cornelius Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 14 Kinsella St Belmont, Brisbane QLD, 4153 Please report severe thunderstorms on our Queensland severe thunderstorm reporting line on (07) 3390 4218 or by going to our homepage at http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 030 From: "Debbie Parker" [debp at rie.net.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Storm Chase around Melbourne Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 21:54:47 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 031 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 22:21:29 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius [cyclone at flatrate.net.au] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne cells Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Macca, > > Well - I do know something - I can guarantee that while driving, thunder is > very difficult to hear even when very close (i also found out today with > several strikes within 3km of me). I'm not sure if this is due to the road > noise, the movement of the car or something else. Anyone? Certainly, it's much harder to hear thunder in cars (with the windows up of course!) Especially in newer cars that are well shielded from outside noise, or older/more powerful cars that have louder engines then other cars. Another reason, would be the way you're moving compared to the sound waves (something along the doppler effect of a siren???) If you're moving towards the sound, or away from the sound - it might have an effect. But whether or not the speed of sound relative to the speed you are travelling has a dramatic effect, I'm not sure - just pure speculation. I had a similar event on Dec 10, 1999 when a lightning strike hit a pole close to me while driving. It sounded almost like a gun shot. -- Anthony Cornelius Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 14 Kinsella St Belmont, Brisbane QLD, 4153 Please report severe thunderstorms on our Queensland severe thunderstorm reporting line on (07) 3390 4218 or by going to our homepage at http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 032 X-Originating-IP: [210.84.138.243] From: "Chris Gribben" [chrisgribben at hotmail.com] To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne cells Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 05:39:21 PDT Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi macca, great chase report, you did well :). Fair call about the sound of the thunder whilst driving but this strike was 50m at the very most away, so I do not think it was that personally. Remember that strike we got on the 2nd March last year that was 100m away but wasn't loud at all - this experience was very similar to that, just a bit closer and the thunder less loud. The thunder lasted half a second at most and was more like a poppy gun going off than the shotgun sound you get when strikes are about 300-500m away. It was certainly an experience - hehe Chris >Well - I do know something - I can guarantee that while driving, thunder is >very difficult to hear even when very close (i also found out today with >several strikes within 3km of me). I'm not sure if this is due to the road >noise, the movement of the car or something else. Anyone? > >Macca > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 033 From: "Nick Sykes" [nsykes22 at optushome.com.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Storm Chase around Melbourne Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 22:34:37 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey all Yes a very enjoyable day had in Melbourne today. Woke up about 9 and had a look outside and automatically thought storms, that beautiful cloud was present castelattus. Went on chat for a while but was in need of sleep so went back to bed. At midday I woke (I was planning on 1/2 an hour) and jumped out of bed to see what had devleped. Was pleasant to see some nice pilus out to the west and a nice Cb to the east. I started jumping around like i was on beans and quickly checked radar and sat pic for the latest. Some nice cells were were evident on radar and some nice cloud tops were evident on the satpic in the SW of the state. I decided I would head done the SE. Before I could do anything, my brother came and asked if he could borrow the car to get an oil filter, the one he had brought was the wrong type. So the chase was delayed. I spent this time drooling over the sounding which showed a very cold atmosphere as Macca has already mentioned. A nice cell came over my place early afternoon (green on radar) and dropped some very heavy rain. Heard some nice claps of thunder but saw no lightning Mid afternoon had arrived and my other brother had come over, so we decided to go out in my brothers car for the chase. At this stage we decided to head towards the NE out towards doncaster. On the way a beautiful looking cell had developed to the NW over the city. The way we were heading showed little promise at this stage so we decided to head towards the city cell (was later to be found to be St Kilda with red). As we approahed the features of the cell became evident. A very nice base with some ruffled scud. A well defined precipitation curtain had developed. We headed just shy of the main rain curtain to miss the worse of the rain, earlier in the day it was evident that any rain from these stroms would be very heavy. That all good and well we still got some very heavy rain. Didn't here any thunder while chasing this cell. At this stage it was getting pretty late and my brother had to get home. Got home and that cell we had chased was putting out some nice rumbles of thunder, which goes to show it is very hard to hear thunder when in a car. Overall a very nice day, the main feature of todays storms would have to be the size of the rain drops, i have never seen them so big in cold air storm before. Radar of todays storms can be viewed here http://members.xoom.com/nsykes/radarapril16.gif and see my sat pic site for the sat pic animation. I have setup an easier to remeber domain name and it can be reach at http://www.sesatpics.web.com/ the old domain works as well Nick Sykes SE Australia Satellite Images http://www.sesatpics.web.com/ http://members.xoom.com/nsykes +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 034 From: "Weatherhead" [weatherhead at ozemail.com.au] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne cells Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 23:03:40 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com On a Dark and stormy night Anthony Cornelius wrote: > Another reason, would be the way you're moving compared to the sound > waves (something along the doppler effect of a siren???) If you're > moving towards the sound, or away from the sound - it might have an > effect. But whether or not the speed of sound relative to the speed you > are travelling has a dramatic effect, I'm not sure - just pure > speculation. > > I had a similar event on Dec 10, 1999 when a lightning strike hit a pole > close to me while driving. It sounded almost like a gun shot. Andrew,While you were in Williamstown etc I was on the other side of the bay enjoying the spectacle.Saw a nice CG (around 14:20) hit the water just near Sandringham yacht club ('home' !!) with simultaneous thunder & heavy rain & winds that increased from around 10 knots to 25 knots in about 5 minutes. At about 16:00 or so another cell hit but I didn't get out taking photos until around 17:00 when I saw the next one heading right for me. I took a few shots from Picnic Point at Sandringham before moving towards Brighton - I got some nice shots of the rain curtain at sunset - little bit of mammatus on the leading edge - and managed to finish off the film & wished I'd had more!! Not a lot of lightning/thunder in any of them but great nonetheless.CheersDebbie Parker----- Original Message -----From: McDonaldSent: Sunday, April 16, 2000 8:00 PMSubject: aus-wx: Storm Chase around MelbourneEvening all,After a phonecall from Jane at 12:30pm telling me that there was some serious looking congestus to the SW and W I decided on a storm chase after checking radar, soundings and forecast charts. LI's of -1 to -2 and CAPE of 500 or so across Central Victoria had me more than a little interested, along with the 20knt 850mb winds, 60knt 500mb winds and a 300mb jet of 105 knts. Also the temperature profile of the atmosphere was interesting me with thoughts of hail popping into mind with 850 temps of 8C, 500mb temps of -21C and 300mb temps of -46C.<snip lots>Thanks to Matt Smith (for the radar updates), Clyve Herbert (who rang me at the start of the chase), Jane O'Neill (who alerted me to the developing situation and then kept me informed as to what was happening where she was) and Claire McDonald (for telling me how good the storms were out in the E of the state while I was in the W of the state - thanks sis - hehe).I hope the other Melbournites enjoyed this system. Thanks and congrats to Nick Sykes for picking up the potential for this system yesterday even though the BoM were only going for showers.Andrew McDonald(MSC - Macca)I have had similar experiences. I recall on Dec 14 1998 a lightning strike hit just ahead of my car, and it was more of a explosion than a deep boom, like i was used to. I can think of two reasons (none of which have any scientific knowledge behind them). #1- The insulation, like anthony said, is very good on cars, so you only get the more louder 'harsher' sounds (...middle range to high range..??) and the deeper bassier sounds are muffled and lost. #2 -The deeper, lower sound waves which make up the 'booms' travel at a different level away from the strike, so at ground zero, where the strike occurs, the deeper sounds 'miss' you because they need the surrounding atmosphere, space (whatever...) in which to travel/ and form. So at groud zero you get a higher pitched gunshot sound and further away, when the sound has bounced around a bit you get a lower pitched sound. Do i need to draw a diagram?? =) Again this has no scientific knowledge behind it, just 'speculation' Daniel Weatherhead weatherhead at ozemail.com.au ============================ SYDNEY STORM CHASERS http://www.sydneystormchasers.com ============================ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 035 From: "John Woodbridge" [jrw at pixelcom.net] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: RE: aus-wx: (Very Embarrassing) Weather Doco On Last Night Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 23:28:45 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com He he. I even taped it (maybe I'll send it to Jimmy). I really liked the shot of Anthony divining (or was that worshipping?) a storm from the edge of the road up Mt. Coot-tha. They even used their helicopter for that! But congratulations for having the balls to do it!! I agree with you totally Anthony. But I will go further and say I thought that what Roger Stone said was, by and large, a load of dingoes kidneys. I found little cohesion in his argument. While I also think we are trending back towards '70's style climate, I certainly can't see the argument that this summer was a classic indication of this. Then again, perhaps if you lived at Springbook or Maleny you might arrive at a different opinion. Regards, John. >snip H>i Damien, Carl and all, >Thanks for the kind words guys! Much appreciated, although I don't feel >any less stupid :-) ... >If anyone has any opinions, or information - I'd be very interested to >hear it! As I said, these are just my opinions, and I'm by no means an >expert - so please don't take it as if I'm saying Roger Stone is >incorrect! Anthony Cornelius +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ 036 From: "John Woodbridge" [jrw at pixelcom.net] To: [aussie-weather at world.std.com] Subject: RE: aus-wx: Thunder intensity, was Melbourne cells Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 23:10:57 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com My 0.2c worth (actually make that 0.1c). I would presume that maximum intensity sound waves propagate at right angles to the lightning channel, which would correspond to the direction of air displacment. On that basis, if you are directly underneath a point of lightning contact, such as the top of a power pole, and further, the flash is fairly vertical, then you are close to 0 degrees of the channel path. I can see an argument for the sound being less loud than were you say 50 meters away and hence close to 90 degrees of the path (using a line drawn from you to the nearest section of the lightning channel). I don't know about you, but I ALWAYS wind the window down during a thunderstorm (so what's a bit of rain...), to make sure I get the most out of the bangs. (Oh you poor sick person). John. >snip Another reason, would be the way you're moving compared to the sound waves (something along the doppler effect of a siren???) If you're moving towards the sound, or away from the sound - it might have an effect. But whether or not the speed of sound relative to the speed you are travelling has a dramatic effect, I'm not sure - just pure speculation. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
Document: 000416.htm
Updated: 03 June 2000 |
[Australian Severe Weather index] [Copyright Notice] [Email Contacts] |