From: tlang at freeway.apana.org.au (Tony Langdon) Date: 29 Aug 00 23:33:35 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE Organization: Fidonet: Freeway Usenet <=> FTN gateway To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello MSC! 29 Aug 00 23:11, you wrote to Aussie-wx: MO> Um, did anyone feel an earth tremor at ~2305? came from the NE towards MO> the SW, just a quick twist, but it got Cadence off the bed & I felt MO> the floor twist slightly - it was here & gone - no rumbling - MO> interesting to see who else felt it - Nick Sykes in Clayton did too. Yes, felt it in Niddrie. Apparently, the epicentre was in Gippsland, and it was a fully fledged earthquake. Tony, VK3JED .. Excuse me, is this yours? Your dog left it on my lawn. -- |Fidonet: Tony Langdon 3:633/284.18 |Internet: tlang at freeway.apana.org.au | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jra at upnaway.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 22:23:45 +0800 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Ira Fehlberg Subject: Re: aus-wx: Awesome Tornado Footage Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com any idea when this is going to be on? At 10:43 29/08/00 GMT, you wrote: >Hi everyone, > I just caught a glimpse of some awesome tornado footage on a >program to be screened on the ABC about following the torch relay across the >outback, I think... >Sorry, I can't remember the name of the program but it will be screening >very soon and from what I saw it looks like the best tornado footage I have >seen from this country. >Paul. >_________________________________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "clyve herbert" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: River rises in NE Vic Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 02:12:08 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Bussie. It seems the north east may be primed for a flood ,when we consider that the extensive winter snow accumulations haven't started to melt yet. Regards Clyve H. ----- Original Message ----- From: bussie To: weather list Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 1:38 PM Subject: aus-wx: River rises in NE Vic > Was talking to a bloke this morning from the Murray River Control Group I > think he called it. Not sure who he was but he seemed to know what he was on > about. He was saying that the Hume dam is filling rapidly with an increase > of 1.7% since yesterday, now at 87.2%. Apparently there is some meeting > tomorrow where they will decide if they should pre-release some of the > water. The river gauge at Albury apparently is kept under 1.9 to 2 metres if > at all possible. With pre-releases this could reach 4 metres by some time > next week, and if rainfall continues this week, especially with any heavy > falls, then this level may reach 5 metres. > > Here at Rutherglen the average monthly rainfall has already been passed from > the average of 61.8mm to 92mm up until yesterday. Basically the place is > pretty water logged. > > Bussy (NE Victoria) > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 12:23:23 -0400 From: "Leslie R. Lemon" Subject: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: Earthquake in Melbourne just now?? To: "INTERNET:aussie-weather at world.std.com" X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id MAA29439 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com One thing is certain......the press will call it a "mini" quake. Australia doesn't really have the 'real' thing, you know that, of course. LOL. Les ************************ Leslie R. Lemon Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist Tel. 816-373-3533, 816-213-3237 E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 12:34:45 -0400 From: "Leslie R. Lemon" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fires *cough .. cough* (was River rises in NE Vic) To: "INTERNET:aussie-weather at world.std.com" X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id MAA04115 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I found these pics to be just great! They have an artistic character to them, especially those nighttime closeups. Les > Funny you should say that - seems we have had dozens of fires around my > local area the last few weeks, and today i was actually in the right place > at the right time and managed to get a few pictures > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fires2.jpg > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fires.jpg > > The smoke in the second pic was just awesome - that was quite a nasty > (although small) fire > > And i also got some night shots (with the digi cam) of a fire VERY close to > my suburb a few weeks back > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire3.jpg > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire1.jpg > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire2.jpg ************************ Leslie R. Lemon Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist Tel. 816-373-3533, 816-213-3237 E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com essage text written by INTERNET:aussie-weather at world.std.com >Funny you should say that - seems we have had dozens of fires around my local area the last few weeks, and today i was actually in the right place at the right time and managed to get a few pictures http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fires2.jpg http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fires.jpg The smoke in the second pic was just awesome - that was quite a nasty (although small) fire And i also got some night shots (with the digi cam) of a fire VERY close to my suburb a few weeks back http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire3.jpg http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire1.jpg http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire2.jpg< +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: carls at ford.ace-net.com.au Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 03:50:09 +1000 To: Aussie Weather List From: Carl Smith Subject: aus-wx: ASTROMETEOROLOGY: - forecast for the Olympics Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All. Some time ago there was a thread on astrometeorology, where a generally skeptical attitude was expressed by the few who commented. I am not so quick to dismiss this as a purely crank idea, granted that the astrology columns in the daily papers are rather amusing at best. For a long time I have been aware of the fact that there are daily atmospheric tides that correspond to the ocean tides - I was taught this at school - and I have yet to hear of any meteorologist or computer model that takes this regular cyclic phenomena into account in their weather forecasts (please correct me if I'm wrong). As with the ocean tides, the atmospheric tides are infuenced by a combination of the gravitational forces of the Sun and Moon, and this follows several predictable cycles: a ~23 hr cycle, a ~29 day cycle Lunar, a ~18 year nodal cycle, and the Moon's perigee cycle (I no longer remember how long that is), which is what enables accurate tide tables to be issued years in advance for any location - such tables should also be possible for the atmospheric tides. There are also other external factors that appear to influence our weather, such as the 11 year Sunspot cycle, with periods of increased Solar activity causing the Earth to be bombarded with more frequent storms of charged particles - active Solar periods also seem to coincide with periods of more severe / extreme weather. Some of you may know that the published ionospheric shortwave radio propagation forecasts widely used in communications around the globe are in part based on the heliocentric positions of planets relative to each other in their orbits around the Sun, and the state of the 11 year Sunspot cycle, and these forecasts have proved to be a useful guide for shortwave radio operators around the globe. From what I have read (some time ago know) about the process of making these forecasts, it seems that heliocentric planetary angular relationships of around 0 degrees, 90 degrees, 180 degrees, and 270 degrees, correspond to times of unsettled ionospheric conditions and so poor propogation, and angular relationships of around 60 degrees, 120 degrees, 240 degrees, and 300 degrees correspond to periods of relative calm ionspheric conditions and so good propogation - an overall judgement is made by combining the way the planets fit this approximate pattern, and I understand that different planets are given different levels of 'weighting' in this system - unfortunately, it was quite a while ago that I read about this, and no longer have the source information or where it can be found, but if anyone knows, I would be interested to find out. If this method works reasonably well as part of the basis for shortwave radio propogation forecasts, why is there apparently no-one in the meteorological field looking at these factors in regards to our weather? Both conditions in the ionosphere (which apparently are reasonably predictable) and atmospheric tides (also should be reasonably predictable) may have some bearing on weather conditions, and could hold valuable clues to long-range weather forecasting - all that is required to investigate it is the long term weather records of a reasonable number of locations and a program that can generate Sun and Moon relationships to see how the regular 29 day and ~18 year cyclic phenomena compares with the weather records of various locations, a means of analysing at the heliocentric positions of the planets to make similar comparisons, and a long term sunspot record could be a useful addition to this - if there is indeed any clear patterns of relationship to any or all of these factors, they should become apparent to someone with a mind open enough to have a look. As a means to find out what others may be doing in this general area, granted that their methods may be quite different to the ideas I expressed above, 2 days ago I joined an astrometeorology list and issued an invitation for it's members to to send their astrometeorology forecasts for the Sydney Olympics for posting on the internet prior to the Olympics so that anyone who is interested can see just how accurate or otherwise they are. The first forecast has already been sent to me, and I have posted it at http://www.ace-net.com.au/~carls/Olympics.html. I will be quite interested to see how accurate or otherwise this (and any yet to arrive) forecasts will turn out to be, and I am sure some of you may also be curious to see the results. Regards, Carl. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.29.156.7] From: "T Middleton" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 05:33:38 EST X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2000 19:33:38.0375 (UTC) FILETIME=[079A4D70:01C011F0] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hi everyone, yes i felt it here in Wonthaggi too,i was in bed watching tv and the window was rattling and i felt my bed move a little too. >From: MSC - Jane ONeill >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: Aussie-wx , Ray Kollmorgen > >Subject: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE >Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 23:11:42 +1000 > >Um, did anyone feel an earth tremor at ~2305? came from the NE towards >the SW, just a quick twist, but it got Cadence off the bed & I felt the >floor twist slightly - it was here & gone - no rumbling - interesting to >see who else felt it - Nick Sykes in Clayton did too. > >Jane ONeill >Melbourne - earthquake capital of Australia > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "bussie" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: River rises in NE Vic Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 06:54:05 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yeah, It's been quite a while since I saw the Murray flood last time. This bloke reckons that the snow on the mountains equates to about 7 inches of water on the ground when it melts. So there's a fair bit of water to come down yet. Bussy ----- Original Message ----- From: clyve herbert To: Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 2:12 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: River rises in NE Vic > Hi Bussie. > It seems the north east may be primed for a flood ,when we consider that the > extensive winter snow accumulations haven't started to melt yet. Regards > Clyve H. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: bussie > To: weather list > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 1:38 PM > Subject: aus-wx: River rises in NE Vic > > > > Was talking to a bloke this morning from the Murray River Control Group I > > think he called it. Not sure who he was but he seemed to know what he was > on > > about. He was saying that the Hume dam is filling rapidly with an increase > > of 1.7% since yesterday, now at 87.2%. Apparently there is some meeting > > tomorrow where they will decide if they should pre-release some of the > > water. The river gauge at Albury apparently is kept under 1.9 to 2 metres > if > > at all possible. With pre-releases this could reach 4 metres by some time > > next week, and if rainfall continues this week, especially with any heavy > > falls, then this level may reach 5 metres. > > > > Here at Rutherglen the average monthly rainfall has already been passed > from > > the average of 61.8mm to 92mm up until yesterday. Basically the place is > > pretty water logged. > > > > Bussy (NE Victoria) > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [141.132.128.10] From: "Leslie Baxter" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: Earthquake in Melbourne just now?? Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 21:51:11 GMT X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2000 21:51:11.0365 (UTC) FILETIME=[3EC4A350:01C01203] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com So Newcastle's Earthquake wasn't a earthquake, hmmmmmmmm? >From: "Leslie R. Lemon" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: "INTERNET:aussie-weather at world.std.com" >Subject: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: Earthquake in Melbourne just now?? >Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 12:23:23 -0400 > >One thing is certain......the press will call it a "mini" quake. Australia >doesn't really have the 'real' thing, you know that, of course. LOL. > >Les > >************************ >Leslie R. Lemon >Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist >Tel. 816-373-3533, 816-213-3237 >E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [141.132.128.10] From: "Leslie Baxter" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: Earthquake in Melbourne just now?? Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 21:47:48 GMT X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2000 21:47:48.0963 (UTC) FILETIME=[C6208B30:01C01202] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 4.5 on the rickie scale. It was out Gippsland, but nothing happened here in boring ol' ballarat, just fog, heavy dew/frost. Damn cold. Les >From: Robert Goler >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: Earthquake in Melbourne just now?? >Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 22:15:14 +1000 (EST) > > >Hi all > >I know this is off topic, but while sitting in the computing room on the >4th floor of the maths building at Monash Uni (Clayton), my computer >monitor began to oscillate back an forth by about 1 cm each way. I >could also feel the table under my arms moving. This lasted for about 10 >secs and was quite noticeable! > >Did anyone else notice this and was this an (mini :-) )earthquake? > >I wasn't sure if it was the floor slightly moving or just my adrenalin >rushing, and there weren't any other things which I could see that would >show motion. > >This occurred at 23:07EST. > >Wow, at the moment, I'm kinda on edge, and a bit shook up if you pardon >the pun. > > >Cheers > >-- > >Robert A. Goler > >E-mail robert at mail.maths.monash.edu.au >http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ > >Department of Mathematics and Statistics >Monash University >Clayton, Vic 3800 >Australia > >-- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:30:09 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fires *cough .. cough* (was River rises in NE Vic) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, It was somewhat depressing that when I arrived on Monday morning, I thought Sydney's air was cleaner than Brisbane's!!! No offence Sydney-Siders :) Media reports have indicated that there have been over 1000 fires across SE QLD over the past 10 days, yesterday a house was lost - in what has been called the worse start to the fire season since 1994. A lot of the area just SW/W/NW of Brisbane is extremely dry - while Brisbane has had some precipitation earlier this year from coastal shower/rain events - just inland has had very little. Our neighbour at Hiddenvale(Grandchester) at the farm has had his family keeping rainfall records to the early 1900's. He said that according to their records, it's been the driest year in 74 years! We've had over 2 weeks of strong SW'ly to NW'ly winds, which have been very dry (DP's hovering around 0 constantly) - and combine that with the low lifes who often light these fires, and you have trouble :( Some mid-high level cloud coming through today... Anthony Cornelius Ben Quinn wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > worried that if significant rainfall does not occur by late October / > > November we could be setting up for a potentially bad bushfire season. > > Funny you should say that - seems we have had dozens of fires around my > local area the last few weeks, and today i was actually in the right place > at the right time and managed to get a few pictures > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fires2.jpg > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fires.jpg > > The smoke in the second pic was just awesome - that was quite a nasty > (although small) fire > > And i also got some night shots (with the digi cam) of a fire VERY close to > my suburb a few weeks back > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire3.jpg > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire1.jpg > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire2.jpg > > The last two pics are closeups of small areas of grass on fire well away > from the main fire > > *shrugs* Thought people may have been interested - although i can't see > myself making a habit of going out and photographing these things - my dad > owns a property NW of Brisbane, and i have been up there when he has burnt > off some of the paddocks - when the wind got behind a fire one day it moved > at a frightening pace, and burning to death is not the way i want to go > out... :) -- Anthony Cornelius Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 14 Kinsella St Belmont, Brisbane QLD, 4153 Please report severe thunderstorms on our Queensland severe thunderstorm reporting line on (07) 3390 4218 or by going to our homepage at http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:44:53 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: Australian Weather Mailing List Subject: aus-wx: Recommendation for Storm Chasers Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, This was touched on briefly last year, but I'd like to bring it up again as we roll into our storm(chase) season. That is, installing CB radios into your car! They're a fantastic tool, and pretty much an essential item for anyone who wants to "team up" with other cars and chase. It'll set you back about $150 (including the unit, antenna, mount bracket for antenna etc) - but think about the following: - The number of phone calls you'll cut down on from not having to constantly ring other people in your convoy to discuss things. - You only need one person to receive a radar update, and it can be broadcasted to everyone very easily. - You don't need to constantly stop all the time (wasting time and money) to talk about what you want to do - you can do it just using the CB! - You can warn people behind you that you're going to stop soon to pull over - useful if you don't want people to accidently rear end you -or- - You can use the CB radio and be spaced out (100m per car), so that people can ovetake you safely if they wish and you have plenty of notice of upcoming hazards (dead kanagaroo on the road, going to stop quickly, speed trap ahead etc) - It is MUCH more fun! Instead of having 2 people in the conversation, the entire convoy can join in the conversation! - It's safer in the sense that you're going to do long driving, and you can look out for each other (ie, if some one seems to be drifting too much you can tell them etc). (Could be useful for you Jimmy :-) It really is extremely useful! And makes it easier for everyone to communicate with each other! It's a must for any long distance chasing - and you'll probably be "left out" on TD2K if you don't have one! -- Anthony Cornelius Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 14 Kinsella St Belmont, Brisbane QLD, 4153 Please report severe thunderstorms on our Queensland severe thunderstorm reporting line on (07) 3390 4218 or by going to our homepage at http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: davidkc at advanceenergy.com.au Subject: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE SITE To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:19:36 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Domino/Advance(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21 March 2000) at 30/08/2000 10:19:37 AM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com HI all A good earthquake site is www.incident.com. Dave Bathurst. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "David Findlay" To: Subject: aus-wx: Radar glitch? Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 09:44:41 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I am just looking at the broadscale radar in Brisbane, and there is a very long blue line going along the top. Is this a glitch in the radar? David Findlay +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE in NZ and Tsunami's Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:41:09 +1000 Organization: X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com This raises an interesting point. Would I be right in suggesting any quake in NZ's Fjordland has the potential to generate a Tsunami targeted straight at the Australian coast. Surely this has happened and we kind of live in a false sense that we are immune from these types of natural disasters. I know that if I go for a walk down to the local rocks there are many car size boulders piled up against the vegetation line well above high tide, and not boulders that originated from them. Even being an avid surfer in my younger days I have never saw any seas big enough to move boulders on this scale and number. This includes a couple of cyclone swells with bigger than 30ft sets. ( last swell that big was in the 1970's ). Given that one can assume that sea levels only get lower in recent history ( past 15,000ft years ) I assume it must have been Tsunami waves. Michael > Probably an aftershock of an earthquake felt in Fjordland at 3:50pm today > NZ time that measured 5.4 on the Richter Scale. It was 121 kms deep. > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fires *cough .. cough* (was River rises in NE Vic) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:42:26 +1000 Organization: X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Great pics Ben. I assume that you have a digital camera. What brand do you have as it takes quite good pics, and very TRUE colours. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: Ben Quinn To: Sent: Tuesday, 29 August 2000 22:23 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fires *cough .. cough* (was River rises in NE Vic) > Hi Michael, > > > worried that if significant rainfall does not occur by late October / > > November we could be setting up for a potentially bad bushfire season. > > Funny you should say that - seems we have had dozens of fires around my > local area the last few weeks, and today i was actually in the right place > at the right time and managed to get a few pictures > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fires2.jpg > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fires.jpg > > The smoke in the second pic was just awesome - that was quite a nasty > (although small) fire > > And i also got some night shots (with the digi cam) of a fire VERY close to > my suburb a few weeks back > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire3.jpg > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire1.jpg > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire2.jpg > > The last two pics are closeups of small areas of grass on fire well away > from the main fire > > *shrugs* Thought people may have been interested - although i can't see > myself making a habit of going out and photographing these things - my dad > owns a property NW of Brisbane, and i have been up there when he has burnt > off some of the paddocks - when the wind got behind a fire one day it moved > at a frightening pace, and burning to death is not the way i want to go > out... :) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Thompson" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 10:24 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: River rises in NE Vic > > > > Good to see you getting the rain. Here in the Illawarra I am a little > > worried that if significant rainfall does not occur by late October / > > November we could be setting up for a potentially bad bushfire season. > Just > > about every month this year has had below average rainfall. We have > > something like 500mm to catch up on to get average by the end of year. > Very > > unlikely given that September and October are traditionally quite dry. > > > > It is what the farmers here call a green drought, the grass in green, but > > the creeks, rivers, etc are low. A week of hot dry west winds in Oct/Nov > and > > it will be like tinder. > > > > By the way the wind has picked up over the last couple of hours, we have a > > 20-30knot W/SW at present. ( 10.15pm ) > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: bussie > > To: weather list > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 August 2000 13:38 > > Subject: aus-wx: River rises in NE Vic > > > > > > > Was talking to a bloke this morning from the Murray River Control Group > I > > > think he called it. Not sure who he was but he seemed to know what he > was > > on > > > about. He was saying that the Hume dam is filling rapidly with an > increase > > > of 1.7% since yesterday, now at 87.2%. Apparently there is some meeting > > > tomorrow where they will decide if they should pre-release some of the > > > water. The river gauge at Albury apparently is kept under 1.9 to 2 > metres > > if > > > at all possible. With pre-releases this could reach 4 metres by some > time > > > next week, and if rainfall continues this week, especially with any > heavy > > > falls, then this level may reach 5 metres. > > > > > > Here at Rutherglen the average monthly rainfall has already been passed > > from > > > the average of 61.8mm to 92mm up until yesterday. Basically the place is > > > pretty water logged. > > > > > > Bussy (NE Victoria) > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ben Quinn" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fires *cough .. cough* (was River rises in NE Vic) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:55:34 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Michael, Sure do - just sold my old digi cam (Kodak DC 215) to Jane Oniel in VIC, and upgraded to the DC 240 - you can view the spec sheet here http://www.kodak.com/US/en/digital/genInfo/dc240.jhtml It's has 1.3 megapixel resolution, and as you have said the pictures turn out great - i have found that the exposure and colours of the pictures is exceptional (for a point and shoot) in the whole DC range - for anyone looking for a digi cam around or under the $1000 mark, you can't go past the DC240/280 (280 is the same as the 240 pretty much, just has 2 megapixel resolution and less optical but more digital zoom) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Thompson" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 11:42 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fires *cough .. cough* (was River rises in NE Vic) > Great pics Ben. I assume that you have a digital camera. What brand do you > have as it takes quite good pics, and very TRUE colours. > > Michael > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ben Quinn > To: > Sent: Tuesday, 29 August 2000 22:23 > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fires *cough .. cough* (was River rises in NE Vic) > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > worried that if significant rainfall does not occur by late October / > > > November we could be setting up for a potentially bad bushfire season. > > > > Funny you should say that - seems we have had dozens of fires around my > > local area the last few weeks, and today i was actually in the right place > > at the right time and managed to get a few pictures > > > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fires2.jpg > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fires.jpg > > > > The smoke in the second pic was just awesome - that was quite a nasty > > (although small) fire > > > > And i also got some night shots (with the digi cam) of a fire VERY close > to > > my suburb a few weeks back > > > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire3.jpg > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire1.jpg > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire2.jpg > > > > The last two pics are closeups of small areas of grass on fire well away > > from the main fire > > > > *shrugs* Thought people may have been interested - although i can't see > > myself making a habit of going out and photographing these things - my dad > > owns a property NW of Brisbane, and i have been up there when he has burnt > > off some of the paddocks - when the wind got behind a fire one day it > moved > > at a frightening pace, and burning to death is not the way i want to go > > out... :) > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael Thompson" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 10:24 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: River rises in NE Vic > > > > > > > Good to see you getting the rain. Here in the Illawarra I am a little > > > worried that if significant rainfall does not occur by late October / > > > November we could be setting up for a potentially bad bushfire season. > > Just > > > about every month this year has had below average rainfall. We have > > > something like 500mm to catch up on to get average by the end of year. > > Very > > > unlikely given that September and October are traditionally quite dry. > > > > > > It is what the farmers here call a green drought, the grass in green, > but > > > the creeks, rivers, etc are low. A week of hot dry west winds in Oct/Nov > > and > > > it will be like tinder. > > > > > > By the way the wind has picked up over the last couple of hours, we have > a > > > 20-30knot W/SW at present. ( 10.15pm ) > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: bussie > > > To: weather list > > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 August 2000 13:38 > > > Subject: aus-wx: River rises in NE Vic > > > > > > > > > > Was talking to a bloke this morning from the Murray River Control > Group > > I > > > > think he called it. Not sure who he was but he seemed to know what he > > was > > > on > > > > about. He was saying that the Hume dam is filling rapidly with an > > increase > > > > of 1.7% since yesterday, now at 87.2%. Apparently there is some > meeting > > > > tomorrow where they will decide if they should pre-release some of the > > > > water. The river gauge at Albury apparently is kept under 1.9 to 2 > > metres > > > if > > > > at all possible. With pre-releases this could reach 4 metres by some > > time > > > > next week, and if rainfall continues this week, especially with any > > heavy > > > > falls, then this level may reach 5 metres. > > > > > > > > Here at Rutherglen the average monthly rainfall has already been > passed > > > from > > > > the average of 61.8mm to 92mm up until yesterday. Basically the place > is > > > > pretty water logged. > > > > > > > > Bussy (NE Victoria) > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Damien Howes" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE in NZ and Tsunami's Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:07:10 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Michael, Unless my memory is serving me badly, and it generally does, I believe I once read about boulders somewhere on the SE NSW coast that have been displaced up to 1KM inland from the coast by what could only have been a tsunami in the very long ago. I'm curious if the geometry of the continental shelf down there is conducive to helping the wave " stand up" as it hits the coast. Damien (Brisbane) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Thompson" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 11:41 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE in NZ and Tsunami's > This raises an interesting point. Would I be right in suggesting any quake > in NZ's Fjordland has the potential to generate a Tsunami targeted straight > at the Australian coast. > > Surely this has happened and we kind of live in a false sense that we are > immune from these types of natural disasters. > I know that if I go for a walk down to the local rocks there are many car > size boulders piled up against the vegetation line well above high tide, and > not boulders that originated from them. Even being an avid surfer in my > younger days I have never saw any seas big enough to move boulders on this > scale and number. This includes a couple of cyclone swells with bigger than > 30ft sets. ( last swell that big was in the 1970's ). Given that one can > assume that sea levels only get lower in recent history ( past 15,000ft > years ) I assume it must have been Tsunami waves. > > Michael > > > > Probably an aftershock of an earthquake felt in Fjordland at 3:50pm today > > NZ time that measured 5.4 on the Richter Scale. It was 121 kms deep. > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [210.8.232.3] From: "Patrick Tobin" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE in NZ and Tsunami's Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 04:03:22 GMT X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2000 04:03:22.0365 (UTC) FILETIME=[3D14D2D0:01C01237] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com There is an interesting link on the subject of tsunamis and the Australian coastline at: http://www.es.mq.edu.au/nhrc/nhqapril.htm Also the Emergency Management Australia web-site at http://www.ema.gov.au/fs-community.html cites the 1960 tsunami that hit the east coast as one that caused significant damage (although no details). Mind you the same EMA link also refers to last year's Sydney hailstorm as one that struck without warning.. (funny I recall a Wollongong member of this list - providing just such a warning and this list going ballistic well before the storm did..) I suppose they mean no official warning. Patrick >From: "Damien Howes" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE in NZ and Tsunami's >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:07:10 +1000 > >Hi Michael, Unless my memory is serving me badly, and it generally does, I >believe I once read about boulders somewhere on the SE NSW coast that have >been displaced up to 1KM inland from the coast by what could only have been >a tsunami in the very long ago. I'm curious if the geometry of the >continental shelf down there is conducive to helping the wave " stand up" >as >it hits the coast. >Damien (Brisbane) >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Michael Thompson" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 11:41 AM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE in NZ and Tsunami's > > > > This raises an interesting point. Would I be right in suggesting any >quake > > in NZ's Fjordland has the potential to generate a Tsunami targeted >straight > > at the Australian coast. > > > > Surely this has happened and we kind of live in a false sense that we >are > > immune from these types of natural disasters. > > I know that if I go for a walk down to the local rocks there are many >car > > size boulders piled up against the vegetation line well above high tide, >and > > not boulders that originated from them. Even being an avid surfer in my > > younger days I have never saw any seas big enough to move boulders on >this > > scale and number. This includes a couple of cyclone swells with bigger >than > > 30ft sets. ( last swell that big was in the 1970's ). Given that one can > > assume that sea levels only get lower in recent history ( past 15,000ft > > years ) I assume it must have been Tsunami waves. > > > > Michael > > > > > > > Probably an aftershock of an earthquake felt in Fjordland at 3:50pm >today > > > NZ time that measured 5.4 on the Richter Scale. It was 121 kms deep. > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:32:00 -0400 From: "Leslie R. Lemon" Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: Earthquake in Melbourne just now?? To: "INTERNET:aussie-weather at world.std.com" X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id AAA06823 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Leslie Baxter wrote: > So Newcastle's Earthquake wasn't a earthquake, hmmmmmmmm? I guess you missed my attempt at humor. ************************ Leslie R. Lemon Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist Tel. 816-373-3533, 816-213-3237 E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Woodbridge" To: Cc: Subject: RE: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE in NZ and Tsunami's Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:32:57 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All, Second link has some interesting "facts" in the EMA Aussie disaster list e.g., Jan 85 Brisbane Storm & Jan 91 Sydney (Turramurra) storms both listed as 'incl. Tornado' when in fact I believe that this is not confirmed for either storm. Only severe straight line wind damage was observed. John. >snip Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE in NZ and Tsunami's There is an interesting link on the subject of tsunamis and the Australian coastline at: http://www.es.mq.edu.au/nhrc/nhqapril.htm Also the Emergency Management Australia web-site at http://www.ema.gov.au/fs-community.html cites the 1960 tsunami that hit the east coast as one that caused significant damage (although no details). Mind you the same EMA link also refers to last year's Sydney hailstorm as one that struck without warning.. (funny I recall a Wollongong member of this list - providing just such a warning and this list going ballistic well before the storm did..) I suppose they mean no official warning. Patrick >From: "Damien Howes" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE in NZ and Tsunami's >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:07:10 +1000 > >Hi Michael, Unless my memory is serving me badly, and it generally does, I >believe I once read about boulders somewhere on the SE NSW coast that have >been displaced up to 1KM inland from the coast by what could only have been >a tsunami in the very long ago. I'm curious if the geometry of the >continental shelf down there is conducive to helping the wave " stand up" >as >it hits the coast. >Damien (Brisbane) >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Michael Thompson" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 11:41 AM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE in NZ and Tsunami's > > > > This raises an interesting point. Would I be right in suggesting any >quake > > in NZ's Fjordland has the potential to generate a Tsunami targeted >straight > > at the Australian coast. > > > > Surely this has happened and we kind of live in a false sense that we >are > > immune from these types of natural disasters. > > I know that if I go for a walk down to the local rocks there are many >car > > size boulders piled up against the vegetation line well above high tide, >and > > not boulders that originated from them. Even being an avid surfer in my > > younger days I have never saw any seas big enough to move boulders on >this > > scale and number. This includes a couple of cyclone swells with bigger >than > > 30ft sets. ( last swell that big was in the 1970's ). Given that one can > > assume that sea levels only get lower in recent history ( past 15,000ft > > years ) I assume it must have been Tsunami waves. > > > > Michael > > > > > > > Probably an aftershock of an earthquake felt in Fjordland at 3:50pm >today > > > NZ time that measured 5.4 on the Richter Scale. It was 121 kms deep. > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE in NZ and Tsunami's To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:14:50 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Also the Emergency Management Australia web-site > at > > http://www.ema.gov.au/fs-community.html > > cites the 1960 tsunami that hit the east coast > as one that caused significant damage (although > no details). > I've just been browsing some papers from a 1994 workshop on the subject. There had, to that time, been 16 recorded tsunamis affecting the Australian coastline, of which the 22 May 1960 one (height 1-2m), which affected the coast between Sydney and Brisbane, was the only one that caused significant damage (I haven't been able to ascertain the nature of the damage, either, but imagine it was probably of the sort you'd get from a major east coast low - beach erosion, damaged ships at moorings etc.). There have been bigger ones in WA, but these caused minor (or no) damage because of the sparse settlement of the area. The largest one in the list I saw was listed as 2-6m on 19 August 1977. One on 3 June 1994 is of particular interest; although it did not cause major damage to any settlement, it did inundate a car park and picnic area on the western side of North-West Cape, and may well have resulted in loss of life had it happened during the day (it was actually at about 5.30 a.m.). With one minor exception at Geraldton, all recorded Australian tsunamis have resulted from earthquakes well away from Australia (Chile in 1960, Indonesia in 1994). This means some sort of lead time would be available, although what use a tsunami warning with a couple of hours' lead time would be, especially as very few people (including, I suspect, much of the emergency services) would have any idea how to respond to one, is questionable. The chances of a significant locally generated tsunami are small, although I'm surprised that there is no record of one resulting from the 6.8 earthquake just off the south-east coast of South Australia in May 1899 (which caused severe damage in places like Robe and Kingston). Blair Trewin +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.109.239.139] From: "Paul Graham" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Recommendation for Storm Chasers Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 06:28:07 GMT X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2000 06:28:07.0083 (UTC) FILETIME=[75939FB0:01C0124B] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Try amateur radios too - free from interference with more range (frequency and distance). You have to get a licence but it's not hard to get a novice. Paul G. >From: Anthony Cornelius >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: Australian Weather Mailing List >Subject: aus-wx: Recommendation for Storm Chasers >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:44:53 +1000 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from [199.172.62.20] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id >MHotMailBB7589B5004AD82197CDC7AC3E1440290; Tue Aug 29 15:52:44 2000 >Received: (from daemon at localhost)by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id >SAA22512for aussie-weather-outgoing; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:50:50 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from world.std.com (root at world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5])by >europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA20352for >; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:45:24 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au >[24.192.64.19])by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA14773for >; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:43:32 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from bigpond.net.au (CPE-203-45-155-131.qld.bigpond.net.au >[203.45.155.131])by br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (8.8.6 >(PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id IAA29584for >; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:43:47 +1000 (EST) >From aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Tue Aug 29 15:55:25 2000 >Message-ID: <39AC3CE5.64DABE57 at bigpond.net.au> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) >X-Accept-Language: en >Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >Precedence: list > >Hi all, > >This was touched on briefly last year, but I'd like to bring it up again >as we roll into our storm(chase) season. That is, installing CB radios >into your car! > >They're a fantastic tool, and pretty much an essential item for anyone >who wants to "team up" with other cars and chase. It'll set you back >about $150 (including the unit, antenna, mount bracket for antenna etc) >- but think about the following: > >- The number of phone calls you'll cut down on from not having to >constantly ring other people in your convoy to discuss things. >- You only need one person to receive a radar update, and it can be >broadcasted to everyone very easily. >- You don't need to constantly stop all the time (wasting time and >money) to talk about what you want to do - you can do it just using the >CB! >- You can warn people behind you that you're going to stop soon to pull >over - useful if you don't want people to accidently rear end you -or- >- You can use the CB radio and be spaced out (100m per car), so that >people can ovetake you safely if they wish and you have plenty of notice >of upcoming hazards (dead kanagaroo on the road, going to stop quickly, >speed trap ahead etc) >- It is MUCH more fun! Instead of having 2 people in the conversation, >the entire convoy can join in the conversation! >- It's safer in the sense that you're going to do long driving, and you >can look out for each other (ie, if some one seems to be drifting too >much you can tell them etc). (Could be useful for you Jimmy :-) > >It really is extremely useful! And makes it easier for everyone to >communicate with each other! It's a must for any long distance chasing >- and you'll probably be "left out" on TD2K if you don't have one! >-- >Anthony Cornelius >Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association >(ASWA) >(07) 3390 4812 >14 Kinsella St >Belmont, Brisbane >QLD, 4153 >Please report severe thunderstorms on our Queensland severe thunderstorm >reporting line on (07) 3390 4218 or by going to our homepage at >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: astroman at mail.chariot.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:24:50 +0930 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Andrew Wall Subject: Re: aus-wx: Recommendation for Storm Chasers Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yes I would have to agree that being in Amateur Radio does have it's advantages, if you are chasing across states it can be very handy especially with HF transmission. Although the 2metre band (144MHz) is good for line of sight transmissions and also UHF. The equipment can be costly, but an all mode mobile transceiver would set you back around $2000 or a little more. CB with SSB is also good, but only for stationary transmissions as the noise from your starter coil and plugs can be annoying while driving, but you can cure this interference pretty easily. You will find in America quite a few Chasers are in fact radio HAMS, it's just easier having more than one band to play with, considering the distances involved. Had my say. Andrew Wall VK5NAJ <---yes this is a novice call At 06:28 AM 8/30/00 +0000, you wrote: >Try amateur radios too - free from interference with more range (frequency >and distance). >You have to get a licence but it's not hard to get a novice. >Paul G. > >>From: Anthony Cornelius >>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >>To: Australian Weather Mailing List >>Subject: aus-wx: Recommendation for Storm Chasers >>Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:44:53 +1000 >>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>Received: from [199.172.62.20] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id >>MHotMailBB7589B5004AD82197CDC7AC3E1440290; Tue Aug 29 15:52:44 2000 >>Received: (from daemon at localhost)by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id >>SAA22512for aussie-weather-outgoing; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:50:50 -0400 (EDT) >>Received: from world.std.com (root at world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5])by >>europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA20352for >>; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:45:24 -0400 (EDT) >>Received: from br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au >>(br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au [24.192.64.19])by world.std.com >>(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA14773for ; >>Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:43:32 -0400 (EDT) >>Received: from bigpond.net.au (CPE-203-45-155-131.qld.bigpond.net.au >>[203.45.155.131])by br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (8.8.6 >>(PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id IAA29584for >>; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:43:47 +1000 (EST) > From aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Tue Aug 29 15:55:25 2000 >>Message-ID: <39AC3CE5.64DABE57 at bigpond.net.au> >>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) >>X-Accept-Language: en >>Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >>Precedence: list >> >>Hi all, >> >>This was touched on briefly last year, but I'd like to bring it up again >>as we roll into our storm(chase) season. That is, installing CB radios >>into your car! >> >>They're a fantastic tool, and pretty much an essential item for anyone >>who wants to "team up" with other cars and chase. It'll set you back >>about $150 (including the unit, antenna, mount bracket for antenna etc) >>- but think about the following: >> >>- The number of phone calls you'll cut down on from not having to >>constantly ring other people in your convoy to discuss things. >>- You only need one person to receive a radar update, and it can be >>broadcasted to everyone very easily. >>- You don't need to constantly stop all the time (wasting time and >>money) to talk about what you want to do - you can do it just using the >>CB! >>- You can warn people behind you that you're going to stop soon to pull >>over - useful if you don't want people to accidently rear end you -or- >>- You can use the CB radio and be spaced out (100m per car), so that >>people can ovetake you safely if they wish and you have plenty of notice >>of upcoming hazards (dead kanagaroo on the road, going to stop quickly, >>speed trap ahead etc) >>- It is MUCH more fun! Instead of having 2 people in the conversation, >>the entire convoy can join in the conversation! >>- It's safer in the sense that you're going to do long driving, and you >>can look out for each other (ie, if some one seems to be drifting too >>much you can tell them etc). (Could be useful for you Jimmy :-) >> >>It really is extremely useful! And makes it easier for everyone to >>communicate with each other! It's a must for any long distance chasing >>- and you'll probably be "left out" on TD2K if you don't have one! >>-- >>Anthony Cornelius >>Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association >>(ASWA) >>(07) 3390 4812 >>14 Kinsella St >>Belmont, Brisbane >>QLD, 4153 >>Please report severe thunderstorms on our Queensland severe thunderstorm >>reporting line on (07) 3390 4218 or by going to our homepage at >>http://www.severeweather.asn.au >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > >_________________________________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.134.141.218] From: "Ben Jerrems" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Re: AM radio static Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 18:26:11 EST X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2000 08:26:11.0186 (UTC) FILETIME=[F407F520:01C0125B] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all? Can anyone tell me a bit more about the static on the radio? I understand that we can listen to lightning discharges as they happen, But every time I go out side to check the sky I get nothing! How far does the radio pick up this discharge??? Ben-MSC _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 19:50:38 +1000 From: MSC - Jane ONeill X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: Aussie-wx Subject: aus-wx: CLOUD TYPE: Contrails Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, Finally got around to developing & scanning the photos I took earlier in the month of the magnificent contrails which held together most of the day and then started to shear in the late afternoon. Unfortunately, low light levels haven't helped the quality of the scans. There is a plane in the last 2 photos causing the 'discontinuity' in the cloud & this has thrown a shadow. http://www.stormchasers.au.com/contrails.htm Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Check out the MSC Cafe at http://www.stormchasers.au.com/forecasting.htm ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 19:00:40 +1000 From: Keith Barnett X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Next Saturday storms ? Weather in repeating pattern Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I reckon that that tidying up might just be the precursor to a breakdown of these westerlies altogether with highs starting to track along more southern routes...we will know when the first of those 'summery' southeast changes comes up the south coast of NSW... Michael Thompson wrote: > > The models have advanced the system somewhat to late Friday / Saturday > morning. I am worried about the extent of rainfall, it suggests a general > rain event rather then storms. Both NGP and MRF have a ' tidy up ' of > southern ocean pressure systems for early next week with broad westerlies > rather than the mess of lows and highs we have recently have. > > Michael > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: stuart lloyd > To: > Sent: Tuesday, 29 August 2000 15:57 > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Next Saturday storms ? Weather in repeating pattern > > > Does it look good for New England Tablelands? I'm > > looking forward to something a little more photogenic > > than just a few grey skies and odd snow falls here in > > Armidale. > > > > Stuey. > > --- Michael Thompson wrote: > > > The longer range models are suggesting that northern > > > inland NSW may be good > > > for a storm next Saturday. Jet looks good as well. > > > > > > It is important to realise that these models aren't > > > that crash hot 6 days > > > out, but the weather does seem to be repeating a > > > pattern lately. > > > > > > The suggested scenario for Saturday is almost a > > > carbon copy of today. > > > > > > Worth keeping an eye on. > > > > > > Michael Thompson > > > http://thunder.simplenet.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > > > your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! > > http://mail.yahoo.com/ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 18:57:22 +1000 From: Keith Barnett X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fires *cough .. cough* (was River rises in NE Vic) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Not such a record for Seven Hills rainfall, but that's only because we had a wet March. If we'd had a normal March rainfall it would have been the second driest in 51 years of record. Anthony Cornelius wrote: > > Hi all, > > It was somewhat depressing that when I arrived on Monday morning, I > thought Sydney's air was cleaner than Brisbane's!!! No offence > Sydney-Siders :) > > Media reports have indicated that there have been over 1000 fires across > SE QLD over the past 10 days, yesterday a house was lost - in what has > been called the worse start to the fire season since 1994. > > A lot of the area just SW/W/NW of Brisbane is extremely dry - while > Brisbane has had some precipitation earlier this year from coastal > shower/rain events - just inland has had very little. Our neighbour at > Hiddenvale(Grandchester) at the farm has had his family keeping rainfall > records to the early 1900's. He said that according to their records, > it's been the driest year in 74 years! > > We've had over 2 weeks of strong SW'ly to NW'ly winds, which have been > very dry (DP's hovering around 0 constantly) - and combine that with the > low lifes who often light these fires, and you have trouble :( > > Some mid-high level cloud coming through today... > > Anthony Cornelius > > Ben Quinn wrote: > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > worried that if significant rainfall does not occur by late October / > > > November we could be setting up for a potentially bad bushfire season. > > > > Funny you should say that - seems we have had dozens of fires around my > > local area the last few weeks, and today i was actually in the right place > > at the right time and managed to get a few pictures > > > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fires2.jpg > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fires.jpg > > > > The smoke in the second pic was just awesome - that was quite a nasty > > (although small) fire > > > > And i also got some night shots (with the digi cam) of a fire VERY close to > > my suburb a few weeks back > > > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire3.jpg > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire1.jpg > > http://www.bsch.simplenet.com/ben/fire2.jpg > > > > The last two pics are closeups of small areas of grass on fire well away > > from the main fire > > > > *shrugs* Thought people may have been interested - although i can't see > > myself making a habit of going out and photographing these things - my dad > > owns a property NW of Brisbane, and i have been up there when he has burnt > > off some of the paddocks - when the wind got behind a fire one day it moved > > at a frightening pace, and burning to death is not the way i want to go > > out... :) > > -- > Anthony Cornelius > Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association > (ASWA) > (07) 3390 4812 > 14 Kinsella St > Belmont, Brisbane > QLD, 4153 > Please report severe thunderstorms on our Queensland severe thunderstorm > reporting line on (07) 3390 4218 or by going to our homepage at > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.22.16.30] From: "Rod Aikman" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Bendigo thunderstorm Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 19:07:35 EST X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2000 09:07:35.0768 (UTC) FILETIME=[BCF51580:01C01261] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi everyone, Experienced a nice storm here just after 19:00 this evening. Some very impressive lightning strikes, including quite a few decent cg's; with quite a good peppering of hail up to 10mm diameter. The main activity was just a few kilometres to the south of Bendigo, with a couple of spots of red appearing on the radar. This system formed at the north end of a line which extended from the eastern suburbs of Melbourne, to just beyond Bendigo. Regards, Rod Aikman, Golden Square, Bendigo, Vic _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.29.156.6] From: "T Middleton" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: more new photos Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 19:47:32 EST X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2000 09:47:32.0079 (UTC) FILETIME=[51451FF0:01C01267] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hi everyone, I have just uploaded some more photos from july/august,and even one of a fading aurora i observed in july at http://www.crosswinds.net/~anvils/whats_new.htm T.Middleton. Anvil Industries http://www.anvilindustries.com Wildcoast Images http://www.wildcoastimages.com _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.22.16.30] From: "Rod Aikman" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Victorian STA Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 20:02:52 EST X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2000 10:02:52.0906 (UTC) FILETIME=[76202CA0:01C01269] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com IDW16V00 BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY VICTORIAN REGIONAL OFFICE NEWS FLASH - FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST Severe Thunderstorm Advice Issued at 8:55pm on Wednesday the 30th of August 2000 for Northeast District. Radar imagery at 8.30pm indicates that a line of thunderstorms about 50km east of Bendigo may contain some cells capable of producing atleast medium sized hail and damaging winds. The line is likely to progress to lie near Shepparton to Mansfield over the next 2 hours. West of this line there is no significant activity. This advice is valid until midnight tonight and should not be used after this time. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: skerans at mail.cth.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 20:12:16 +0000 To: From: Sel Kerans Subject: aus-wx: Lightning images you have to see! Cc: paa-teachers at rite.ed.qut.edu.au Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello everyone, A good friend forwarded this URL to me and it is a 'must see'! Be patient for images to download (or use Opera browser!) as it is well worth it - a lighning strike triggered by a plane. Animation adapted from video and a still image. Most incredible lightning shot I've seen. Sel Kerans. > >All, > >I got this from our Warning Coordination Meteorologist. This is just >too AWESOME! > >http://lightning.pwr.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp/lrg/temp/plane.html > >Very interesting. Note the upward branches on the still image. >This >is the 'leader' stroke which propagates UPWARD. The bright white >image in the middle of the animation is the point where the >'connection' is made; the initiation of the RETURN stroke. > >What luck to have a camera there at the time! > >Mike Lewis >SOO WFO JKL > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sel Kerans Coordinator \|/ &&&&& Project Atmosphere Australia On-line -0- .--_|\ "/" WWW: http://www.schools.ash.org.au/paa /|\ / \ \ Email: skerans at mail.cth.com.au \_.--\_/ EQ: sel.kerans at qed.qld.gov.au v ph 07 3881 9623 fax 07 3881 9640 *** Now taking registrations from schools around the world *** *** On-line activities scheduled for March, April, May 2000 *** ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "bussie" To: "weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Conditions Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 21:01:19 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 2mm of rain here from 7pm to 8pm after 18 degrees today and overcast. Bussy (NE Victoria) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: EARTHQUAKE in NZ and Tsunami's Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:52:14 +1000 Organization: X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Interesting about those boulders, I am wondering just where that may be ? My understanding is that any funnel shaped estuary or cover will magnify Tsunamis, the SE Australia coast is rather straight and has only a short continental shelf. That aside I am sure there are local bays, etc that would be affected. Broken Bay is one that comes to mind as it has a relatively wide entrance. I think Sydney Harbours small entrance would protect it. I think a perfect test for Tsunami would be to take sand drill samples on the edge of an estuary like Lake Illawarra / Tuggerah Lakes. These lakes have narrow sand itmas's protecting them from the sea. Any half decent Tsunami would break through the dunes and cross the itmas into the lake. This happened at Lake Illawarra in the 1970's from a cyclone swell, waves actually breached the dunes 10km north of the entrance and ran into the swamps that in those days adjoined Lake Illawarra, this is not the infamous second entrance crap locals tell either, the second entrance theory started from the channel dredged during WW2 to barge cement tank traps blocks to the dunes. ). Anyway back on topic, a drill core sample should reveal a yellow sand layer from any Tsunami, the normal sand on the Lake Edge is grey / black. Michael > Hi Michael, Unless my memory is serving me badly, and it generally does, I > believe I once read about boulders somewhere on the SE NSW coast that have > been displaced up to 1KM inland from the coast by what could only have been > a tsunami in the very long ago. I'm curious if the geometry of the > continental shelf down there is conducive to helping the wave " stand up" as > it hits the coast. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.29.156.7] From: "T Middleton" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: more new photos Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 20:48:08 EST X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2000 10:48:09.0046 (UTC) FILETIME=[C9123F60:01C0126F] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jane, yes, sorry everyone/anyone,that report isn't completed yet as I am waiting to get the photos back,so hopefully early next week it will be up. >Got a not found on your cumulus fishing???????? Jane >hi everyone, >I have just uploaded some more photos from july/august,and even one of a >fading aurora i observed in july at >http://www.crosswinds.net/~anvils/whats_new.htm > >T.Middleton. >Anvil Industries >http://www.anvilindustries.com >Wildcoast Images >http://www.wildcoastimages.com > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: AM radio static Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 21:48:33 +1000 Organization: X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Depends on a number of factors. Your radio, line of sight and time of day. I easily get static from storms 300km out to sea if I am on the coast, but normally 150-200km is the range for my radio. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: Ben Jerrems To: Sent: Thursday, 31 August 2000 9:26 Subject: aus-wx: Re: AM radio static > Hi all? > Can anyone tell me a bit more about the static on the radio? I > understand that we can listen to lightning discharges as they happen, But > every time I go out side to check the sky I get nothing! How far does the > radio pick up this discharge??? > > Ben-MSC > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: tlang at freeway.apana.org.au (Tony Langdon) Date: 30 Aug 00 21:33:28 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Recommendation for Storm Chasers Organization: Fidonet: Freeway Usenet <=> FTN gateway To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello Paul! 30 Aug 00 06:28, you wrote to All: PG> Try amateur radios too - free from interference with more range PG> (frequency and distance). You have to get a licence but it's not hard PG> to get a novice. Paul G. One would suggest both. CB, particularly UHF CB is good for local comms between cars and doesn't require a licence so anyone can take part. Amateur radio is good when more coverage is required. The VHF and UHF bands are populated by many underutilised repeaters, which will provide good coverage up to 100km, and the HF bands can be used for statewide or interstate communications. I spent all of last week cruising around Tasmania, but in constant contact with Melbourne via HF (something you can't do with mobiles down there - they don't work in many areas :) ). On a related note, the Americans are big on storm spotting networks on amateur radio. Is there anything similar in Australia? Is something like this developed in Melbourne, I'd be interested in taking part. My station, in addition to the usual facilities has 18Ah reserve battery power, enough for an hour or two transmitting on HF (100W SSB), about 3-6 hours on VHF high power (25W FM) and well over 24 hours at low power (which is all I need for most repeaters). I do hope to add more capacity in the future for emergency and high power use. Tony, VK3JED .. Cock-tease: A particularly vicious form of torture. -- |Fidonet: Tony Langdon 3:633/284.18 |Internet: tlang at freeway.apana.org.au | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: tlang at freeway.apana.org.au (Tony Langdon) Date: 30 Aug 00 21:40:38 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Recommendation for Storm Chasers Organization: Fidonet: Freeway Usenet <=> FTN gateway To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello Andrew! 30 Aug 00 16:24, you wrote to All: AW> Yes I would have to agree that being in Amateur Radio does have it's AW> advantages, if you are chasing across states it can be very handy AW> especially with HF transmission. Although the 2metre band (144MHz) is AW> good for line of sight transmissions and also UHF. The equipment can AW> be costly, but an all mode mobile transceiver would set you back AW> around $2000 or a little more. CB with SSB is also good, but only for Well, there's a couple of ways one could go. For a VHF-FM only mobile, a converted ex commercial rig (e.g. Philips FM 92) can be picked up ready to go on 2 metres for around $70. There is good secondhand gear available for under $500 for VHF. All mode on VHF is overkill, IMHO, FM and repeaters are all that's needed. For HF, you can pick up an Icom IC706 (original model) for around $800 secondhand, which will do HF plus 2m all mode, or many of the late 80's HF rigs are available on the secondhand market at good prices. I just bought an Icom IC-745 HF box for $550 secondhand. Bit big for most mobiles, but it went around Tassie with me in the back seat. :-) AW> stationary transmissions as the noise from your starter coil and AW> plugs AW> can be annoying while driving, but you can cure this interference Depends how good your noise blanker is. The amateur gear will often be better in this regard (my Icom totally nukes ignition noise on HF). AW> pretty easily. You will find in America quite a few Chasers are in AW> fact radio HAMS, it's just easier having more than one band to play AW> with, considering the distances involved. Indeed. :-) AW> AW> Had my say. AW> AW> Andrew Wall AW> VK5NAJ <---yes this is a novice call Hehe, well, good enough to get on a few useful bands. :-) Tony, VK3JED <-- Nowadays, enough for full band access :) .. .. -- |Fidonet: Tony Langdon 3:633/284.18 |Internet: tlang at freeway.apana.org.au | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: tlang at freeway.apana.org.au (Tony Langdon) Date: 30 Aug 00 21:17:16 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: AM radio static Organization: Fidonet: Freeway Usenet <=> FTN gateway To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello Ben! 30 Aug 00 18:26, you wrote to All: BJ> Can anyone tell me a bit more about the static on the radio? I BJ> understand that we can listen to lightning discharges as they happen, BJ> But every time I go out side to check the sky I get nothing! How far BJ> does the radio pick up this discharge??? There are many types of static, but lightning can be readily heard on frequencies from the AM broadcast band to 10 MHz or higher. If the storm is close enough, lightning discharges can be heard at VHF or even UHF frequencies. If you do hear the static at VHF and UHF (i.e. it interferes with the FM radio or TV), then you'd better go out chasing, the storm's pretty much on top of you! (you will be within a few km, and be able to see the lightning and hear thunder :) ). You can use your ordinary AM radio to listen into lightning. AM car radios are ideal, or at home, string up a good antenna. Tune to a spot in between stations. Normal background noise will be a steady hiss. Lightning appears as strong crackling noises, the strength depending on the distance of the storm and the time of day. At broadcast frequencies (500 kHz - 1.6 MHz), you will hear storms more readily during the night, as propagation improves after sunset (the reason being D layer absorption falls off after sunset, allowing signals to propagate further at night). People with amateur or serious shortwave listening antennas will have no difficulty receiving static discharges from more than 1000km away on frequencies between 500 kHz and 10 MHz. In fact, they are likely to interfere with amateur communications, due to the high energy of the lightning discharges (I had this problem last week when in Tassie). An AM car radio can be an effective storm early warning system, as you will hear the static, even during daytime, before the storm cells are visible. How effective you are depends on how good an antenna you erect. If you want to know more, look up information on building crystal sets (which will discuss antenna systems desiogned for insensitive passive receivers) or operation on the lower amateur HF bands, or SWL sites should have good info too. My HF mobile stations routinely picks up lightning static from thousands of km at night, and up to a couple hundred km by day. Tony, VK3JED .. Don't knock on Death's door. Ring his bell & run away. He HATES that! -- |Fidonet: Tony Langdon 3:633/284.18 |Internet: tlang at freeway.apana.org.au | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Karratha Weather" To: Subject: aus-wx: Severe Wind Warning for SW WA Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 20:09:57 +0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hey all
 
Nice Strong cold front to move thru SW WA tonight.....winds have already started gusting to 109km/h at Cape Leeuwin....with the front to reach Perth at around midnight tonight!
 
check out the obs :)
 
BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN REGIONAL OFFICE

PRIORITY
FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST

SEVERE WIND WARNING
Issued at 8:05 pm WST on Wednesday, 30 August 2000

For the Southwest District and western Southern Coastal District, including the
communities of Bunbury, Busselton and Albany.

A strong cold front was near Cape Leeuwin at 8:00 pm and will move eastwards
across the SW of WA overnight.  

Wind gusts to 110 kilometers per hour have been reported in the area and similar
gusts are expected overnight, with the possibility of damage to property.

Thunderstorms and hail are also expected.  

The State Emergency Service advises that people should secure loose objects and
stay indoors when gales develop. Boat owners should ensure that small craft are
securely moored.

The next advice will be issued at 11:00 pm.
 
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 22:58:36 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Radar glitch? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi David, They're ghost echos. David Findlay wrote: > > I am just looking at the broadscale radar in Brisbane, and there is a very > long blue line going along the top. Is this a glitch in the radar? > > David Findlay > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -- Anthony Cornelius Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 14 Kinsella St Belmont, Brisbane QLD, 4153 Please report severe thunderstorms on our Queensland severe thunderstorm reporting line on (07) 3390 4218 or by going to our homepage at http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------